PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERET vs. NETL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ERET vs. NETL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ERET vs. NETL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ERET
Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF
1.58%10.26%0.60%10.25%0.29%
NETL
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF
5.36%6.05%-1.08%2.69%0.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERET achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than NETL's 5.36% return.


ERET

1D
1.85%
1M
-8.43%
YTD
1.58%
6M
0.99%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
7.25%
5Y*
10Y*

NETL

1D
0.63%
1M
-7.51%
YTD
5.36%
6M
2.83%
1Y
3.68%
3Y*
4.52%
5Y*
2.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ERET vs. NETL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERET has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than NETL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ERET vs. NETL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERET
ERET Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ERET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERET Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ERET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERET Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

NETL
NETL Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
NETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
NETL Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
NETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
NETL Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERET vs. NETL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERETNETLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.58

0.23

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.94

0.43

+0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.05

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

0.40

+0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.65

1.43

+2.22

ERET vs. NETL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERET Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is higher than the NETL Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERET and NETL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ERETNETLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

0.23

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.17

+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between ERET and NETL is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ERET vs. NETL - Dividend Comparison

ERET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than NETL's 4.98% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
ERET
Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF
3.74%3.79%4.26%3.67%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NETL
NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF
4.98%5.12%5.08%4.57%4.47%4.03%3.98%2.52%

Drawdowns

ERET vs. NETL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERET drawdown since its inception was -20.30%, smaller than the maximum NETL drawdown of -51.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERET and NETL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ERETNETLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.30%

-51.48%

+31.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.85%

-11.76%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.47%

-7.97%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-11.89%

+5.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

3.40%

-0.67%

Volatility

ERET vs. NETL - Volatility Comparison

Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) at 4.60%. This indicates that ERET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NETL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ERETNETLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

4.60%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.34%

9.78%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

15.88%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.85%

18.05%

-2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.85%

26.16%

-10.31%