ERET vs. BLDG
ERET (Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. ERET is passively managed, while BLDG is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ERET returned 8.59%/yr vs 9.02%/yr for BLDG. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ERET charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.
Performance
ERET vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERET achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly lower than BLDG's 12.00% return.
ERET
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 8.03%
- YTD
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- 13.42%
- 3Y*
- 8.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLDG
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- YTD
- 12.00%
- 1Y
- 12.90%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- —
ERET vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERET Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF | 10.29% | 10.26% | 0.60% | 10.25% | 0.29% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 12.00% | 4.26% | 8.18% | 1.76% | 3.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between ERET and BLDG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2022 | 0.85 |
The correlation between ERET and BLDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ERET vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank
ERET
BLDG
ERET vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ERET | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.19 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.29 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.73 | 4.52 | +0.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ERET vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERET drawdown since its inception was -20.30%, smaller than the maximum BLDG drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERET and BLDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERET | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.30% | -27.25% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.47% | -10.08% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.61% | -18.57% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -1.06% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -9.07% | +3.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 2.87% | -0.03% |
Volatility
ERET vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) is 3.96%, while Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) has a volatility of 4.66%. This indicates that ERET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ERET | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 4.66% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.03% | 9.41% | +0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.44% | 11.69% | +0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.71% | 15.28% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.71% | 15.53% | +0.18% |
ERET vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERET has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
ERET vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison
ERET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than BLDG's 5.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.25% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% |
ERET Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF | 3.30% | 3.79% | 4.26% | 3.67% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ERET and BLDG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLDG has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to ERET (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERET dropped -20.30% vs BLDG's -27.25%.
On 3-year performance, BLDG leads with 9.02% vs 8.59% for ERET. On fees, ERET is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, ERET has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BLDG has performed better with a 9.02% return vs 8.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ERET is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BLDG.
BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.25%, compared with 3.30% for ERET.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ERET and 0.59% for BLDG.
BLDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ERET and BLDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer