PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERET vs. BLDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ERET vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ERET vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ERET
Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF
2.59%10.26%0.60%10.25%0.29%
BLDG
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF
-0.71%4.26%8.18%1.76%3.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERET achieves a 2.59% return, which is significantly higher than BLDG's -0.71% return.


ERET

1D
1.00%
1M
-7.15%
YTD
2.59%
6M
1.80%
1Y
10.07%
3Y*
7.60%
5Y*
10Y*

BLDG

1D
0.23%
1M
-7.55%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
-4.12%
1Y
6.29%
3Y*
5.76%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ERET vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERET has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ERET vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERET
ERET Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
ERET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERET Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ERET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERET Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BLDG
BLDG Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
BLDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLDG Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BLDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLDG Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERET vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERETBLDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.62

0.47

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.99

0.73

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.10

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

0.58

+0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.79

2.11

+1.68

ERET vs. BLDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERET Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the BLDG Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERET and BLDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ERETBLDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

0.47

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.38

+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between ERET and BLDG is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ERET vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison

ERET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than BLDG's 6.11% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
ERET
Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF
3.70%3.79%4.26%3.67%0.64%0.00%0.00%
BLDG
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF
6.11%7.46%7.97%4.99%3.99%10.40%0.59%

Drawdowns

ERET vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERET drawdown since its inception was -20.30%, smaller than the maximum BLDG drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERET and BLDG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ERETBLDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.30%

-27.25%

+6.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.85%

-10.80%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.55%

-8.75%

+1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-9.44%

+3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

2.98%

-0.21%

Volatility

ERET vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison

Ishares Environmentally Aware Real Estate ETF (ERET) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) at 4.17%. This indicates that ERET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ERETBLDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

4.17%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.38%

7.34%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.19%

13.30%

+2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.85%

15.22%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.85%

15.60%

+0.25%