ERBIX vs. GQFPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund (ERBIX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX).
ERBIX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Oct 11, 2010. GQFPX is managed by GQG Partners Inc. It was launched on Jun 29, 2021.
Performance
ERBIX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ERBIX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERBIX Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund | -2.81% | 18.35% | 15.00% | 14.63% | -14.75% | 3.92% |
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund | 10.08% | 19.29% | 4.81% | 15.09% | -1.13% | 5.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERBIX achieves a -2.81% return, which is significantly lower than GQFPX's 10.08% return.
ERBIX
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- -2.81%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 17.69%
- 3Y*
- 12.66%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.21%
GQFPX
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- 10.08%
- 6M
- 11.45%
- 1Y
- 19.15%
- 3Y*
- 16.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ERBIX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERBIX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ERBIX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank
ERBIX
GQFPX
ERBIX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund (ERBIX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ERBIX | GQFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 1.58 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | 2.03 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.33 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 1.96 | -0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.94 | 9.35 | -2.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ERBIX | GQFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.58 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.87 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between ERBIX and GQFPX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ERBIX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison
ERBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.67%, more than GQFPX's 4.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERBIX Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund | 18.67% | 18.14% | 4.12% | 8.82% | 5.97% | 13.08% | 2.63% | 16.82% | 5.93% | 5.78% | 3.59% | 2.32% |
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund | 4.83% | 5.32% | 3.71% | 3.69% | 5.18% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ERBIX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERBIX drawdown since its inception was -29.18%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERBIX and GQFPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERBIX | GQFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.18% | -16.95% | -12.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.44% | -9.37% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.59% | -2.80% | -4.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.53% | -3.03% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 2.08% | +0.56% |
Volatility
ERBIX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund (ERBIX) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 3.97%. This indicates that ERBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ERBIX | GQFPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 3.97% | +2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.26% | 6.99% | +3.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 12.37% | +4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 12.88% | +2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 12.88% | +3.48% |