PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERAS vs. LEGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERAS vs. LEGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Erasca, Inc. (ERAS) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERAS achieves a 277.69% return, which is significantly higher than LEGR's 11.18% return.


ERAS

1D
0.29%
1M
37.34%
YTD
277.69%
6M
290.28%
1Y
849.32%
3Y*
68.63%
5Y*
10Y*

LEGR

1D
0.92%
1M
4.00%
YTD
11.18%
6M
13.29%
1Y
28.16%
3Y*
22.32%
5Y*
11.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERAS vs. LEGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ERAS
Erasca, Inc.
277.69%48.21%17.84%-50.58%-72.34%-2.01%
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
11.18%30.83%16.25%22.79%-19.01%4.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ERAS and LEGR is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERAS vs. LEGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERAS
ERAS Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ERAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERAS Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ERAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERAS Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

LEGR
LEGR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
LEGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEGR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
LEGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEGR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERAS vs. LEGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Erasca, Inc. (ERAS) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ERASLEGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.34

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.90

2.64

+11.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

43.69

9.72

+33.97

ERAS vs. LEGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERAS Sharpe Ratio is 7.95, which is higher than the LEGR Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERAS and LEGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ERAS vs. LEGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERAS drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, which is greater than LEGR's maximum drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERAS and LEGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERASLEGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.65%

-36.12%

-59.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.46%

-10.40%

-49.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.68%

-14.25%

-53.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.28%

-2.56%

-39.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.66%

-6.60%

-68.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.96%

2.82%

+16.14%

Volatility

ERAS vs. LEGR - Volatility Comparison

Erasca, Inc. (ERAS) has a higher volatility of 20.78% compared to First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) at 5.87%. This indicates that ERAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERASLEGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.78%

5.87%

+14.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

96.05%

12.07%

+83.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.00%

14.34%

+89.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.41%

17.07%

+66.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.41%

20.33%

+63.08%

Dividends

ERAS vs. LEGR - Dividend Comparison

ERAS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LEGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ERAS
Erasca, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LEGR
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF
1.68%1.84%2.40%2.56%2.64%1.80%0.95%2.04%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERAS and LEGR have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ERAS has higher volatility (20.78%) compared to LEGR (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERAS dropped -95.65% vs LEGR's -36.12%.

ERAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.95 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERAS and LEGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer