PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQTY vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQTY vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kovitz Core Equity ETF (EQTY) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQTY achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return.


EQTY

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.29%
YTD
1.88%
6M
3.56%
1Y
14.80%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
10Y*

MTUM

1D
1.06%
1M
15.90%
YTD
31.75%
6M
32.38%
1Y
41.76%
3Y*
34.75%
5Y*
15.21%
10Y*
17.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQTY vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EQTY
Kovitz Core Equity ETF
1.88%13.63%19.89%26.97%-3.83%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
31.75%22.15%32.89%9.15%-1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between EQTY and MTUM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2022

0.71

The correlation between EQTY and MTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.73 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EQTY vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQTY
MTUM

Technology

23.8%
44.4%

Financial Services

19.0%
10.4%

Industrials

16.3%
15.6%

Healthcare

14.3%
6.9%

Communication Services

11.1%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
3.3%

Energy

1.5%
3.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

1.6%

Technology

EQTY
23.8%
MTUM
44.4%

Financial Services

EQTY
19.0%
MTUM
10.4%

Industrials

EQTY
16.3%
MTUM
15.6%

Healthcare

EQTY
14.3%
MTUM
6.9%

Communication Services

EQTY
11.1%
MTUM
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EQTY
10.0%
MTUM
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

EQTY
4.0%
MTUM
3.3%

Energy

EQTY
1.5%
MTUM
3.5%

Basic Materials

EQTY

-

MTUM
1.7%

Real Estate

EQTY

-

MTUM
1.8%

Utilities

EQTY

-

MTUM
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQTY vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQTY
EQTY Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
EQTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQTY Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EQTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQTY Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQTY vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kovitz Core Equity ETF (EQTY) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQTYMTUMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.16

2.20

-1.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.71

2.98

-1.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.39

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

3.64

-2.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.66

14.50

-9.84

EQTY vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQTY and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQTYMTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

2.20

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.11

0.85

+0.26

Drawdowns

EQTY vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQTY drawdown since its inception was -17.28%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQTY and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQTYMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.28%

-34.08%

+16.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.85%

-11.54%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.28%

-20.99%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

0.00%

-2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.71%

-6.21%

+3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

2.89%

+0.30%

Volatility

EQTY vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kovitz Core Equity ETF (EQTY) is 2.58%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that EQTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQTYMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

7.68%

-5.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.45%

16.46%

-7.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.79%

19.04%

-6.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.95%

20.60%

-5.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.95%

21.03%

-6.08%

EQTY vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQTY vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

EQTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than MTUM's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQTY
Kovitz Core Equity ETF
0.02%0.02%0.33%0.26%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.60%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQTY and MTUM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to EQTY (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQTY dropped -17.28% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 3-year performance, MTUM leads with 34.75% vs 15.88% for EQTY. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EQTY has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 34.75% return vs 15.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for EQTY.

MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.02% for EQTY.

EQTY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. EQTY tracks NONE, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Kovitz and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for EQTY and 0.15% for MTUM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQTY and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer