EQRR vs. IWS
EQRR (ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF) and IWS (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - EQRR tracks the Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index while IWS tracks the Russell Midcap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EQRR returned 12.35%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for IWS. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EQRR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWS.
Performance
EQRR vs. IWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQRR achieves a 28.07% return, which is significantly higher than IWS's 15.10% return.
EQRR
- 1D
- 2.42%
- 1M
- 9.12%
- YTD
- 28.07%
- 6M
- 29.12%
- 1Y
- 44.10%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- —
IWS
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 15.10%
- 6M
- 16.20%
- 1Y
- 28.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 10.24%
EQRR vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 28.07% | 15.49% | 7.69% | 9.19% | 2.20% | 36.11% | -10.14% | 19.57% | -18.60% | 15.64% |
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 15.10% | 10.82% | 12.91% | 12.52% | -12.29% | 28.10% | 4.83% | 26.73% | -12.43% | 5.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQRR and IWS is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017 | 0.71 |
The correlation between EQRR and IWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
EQRR vs. IWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQRR
IWS
Technology
Energy
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
EQRR
IWS
Energy
EQRR
IWS
Financial Services
EQRR
IWS
Communication Services
EQRR
IWS
Consumer Cyclical
EQRR
IWS
Industrials
EQRR
IWS
Basic Materials
EQRR
-
IWS
Consumer Defensive
EQRR
-
IWS
Healthcare
EQRR
-
IWS
Real Estate
EQRR
-
IWS
Utilities
EQRR
-
IWS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQRR vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank
EQRR
IWS
EQRR vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQRR | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.29 | 2.15 | +1.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.30 | 3.06 | +1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.37 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.04 | 3.76 | +5.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.66 | 14.20 | +19.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQRR | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29 | 2.15 | +1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.49 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.42 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
EQRR vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQRR drawdown since its inception was -57.93%, smaller than the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQRR and IWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQRR | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.93% | -62.40% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.95% | -7.53% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.75% | -20.57% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.75% | -21.23% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.08% | -8.02% | -2.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.33% | 1.99% | -0.66% |
Volatility
EQRR vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) at 3.42%. This indicates that EQRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQRR | IWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 3.42% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.32% | 9.59% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.49% | 13.19% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 17.30% | +4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 19.36% | +5.51% |
EQRR vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQRR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQRR vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison
EQRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than IWS's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 1.20% | 1.70% | 2.17% | 2.77% | 2.34% | 1.71% | 2.17% | 2.05% | 2.47% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWS iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.50% | 1.76% | 1.93% | 1.39% | 1.87% | 1.97% | 2.53% | 1.96% | 2.10% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQRR and IWS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQRR has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to IWS (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQRR dropped -57.93% vs IWS's -62.40%.
On 5-year performance, EQRR leads with 12.35% vs 8.46% for IWS. On fees, IWS is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, IWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EQRR has performed better with a 12.35% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWS is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQRR.
IWS has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.20% for EQRR.
EQRR tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index, while IWS tracks Russell Midcap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQRR and 0.23% for IWS.
EQRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQRR and IWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer