EQQX.DE vs. CSNDX.MI
EQQX.DE (Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc) and CSNDX.MI (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - EQQX.DE tracks the Nasdaq 100® while CSNDX.MI tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EQQX.DE returned 19.11%/yr vs 18.66%/yr for CSNDX.MI. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EQQX.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CSNDX.MI.
Performance
EQQX.DE vs. CSNDX.MI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQQX.DE achieves a 21.61% return, which is significantly higher than CSNDX.MI's 20.42% return.
EQQX.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 8.86%
- YTD
- 21.61%
- 6M
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 38.41%
- 3Y*
- 25.43%
- 5Y*
- 19.11%
- 10Y*
- —
CSNDX.MI
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 7.99%
- YTD
- 20.42%
- 6M
- 18.69%
- 1Y
- 37.08%
- 3Y*
- 24.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.66%
- 10Y*
- 21.25%
EQQX.DE vs. CSNDX.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQX.DE Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 21.61% | 7.13% | 33.88% | 51.62% | -29.90% | 26.11% |
CSNDX.MI iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 20.42% | 6.74% | 35.09% | 50.07% | -30.24% | 26.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQQX.DE and CSNDX.MI is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021 | 0.99 |
The correlation between EQQX.DE and CSNDX.MI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQQX.DE vs. CSNDX.MI — Risk / Return Rank
EQQX.DE
CSNDX.MI
EQQX.DE vs. CSNDX.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQX.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQQX.DE | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.42 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | 3.79 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.64 | 11.18 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQQX.DE | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 2.42 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.94 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 1.07 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
EQQX.DE vs. CSNDX.MI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQQX.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.17%, roughly equal to the maximum CSNDX.MI drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQX.DE and CSNDX.MI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQQX.DE | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.17% | -31.19% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.97% | -9.95% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.80% | -26.71% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.17% | -31.19% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.81% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.99% | -5.43% | -2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 3.37% | -0.01% |
Volatility
EQQX.DE vs. CSNDX.MI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQX.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSNDX.MI) have volatilities of 4.15% and 4.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQQX.DE | CSNDX.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 4.28% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.89% | 10.79% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.75% | 15.61% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 19.79% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 19.61% | +0.18% |
EQQX.DE vs. CSNDX.MI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQQX.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CSNDX.MI's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQQX.DE vs. CSNDX.MI - Dividend Comparison
Neither EQQX.DE nor CSNDX.MI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, EQQX.DE and CSNDX.MI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EQQX.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EQQX.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CSNDX.MI.
EQQX.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while CSNDX.MI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EQQX.DE and 0.30% for CSNDX.MI.
Find the right allocation for EQQX.DE and CSNDX.MI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer