PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EQQQ.L vs. RBOT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EQQQ.L vs. RBOT.TO

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

EQQQ.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) and RBOT.TO (Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQQQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while RBOT.TO is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EQQQ.L returned 17.89%/yr vs -2.19%/yr for RBOT.TO. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EQQQ.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for RBOT.TO.

Performance

EQQQ.L vs. RBOT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) and Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EQQQ.L is traded in GBp, while RBOT.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the RBOT.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQQQ.L achieves a 17.18% return, which is significantly higher than RBOT.TO's 0.09% return.

EQQQ.L

1D
2.53%
1M
0.63%
YTD
17.18%
6M
17.41%
1Y
38.39%
3Y*
23.63%
5Y*
17.89%
10Y*
22.24%

RBOT.TO

1D
0.05%
1M
-11.49%
YTD
0.09%
6M
-0.32%
1Y
15.79%
3Y*
2.94%
5Y*
-2.19%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQQQ.L vs. RBOT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		17.18%11.54%28.55%47.79%-25.54%29.59%43.32%33.69%4.64%-1.40%
RBOT.TO
Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF		0.09%5.54%6.12%33.12%-41.06%9.14%47.32%28.89%-28.12%-2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EQQQ.L and RBOT.TO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2017

0.55

The correlation between EQQQ.L and RBOT.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

EQQQ.L vs. RBOT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EQQQ.L
RBOT.TO

Technology

59.0%
29.4%

Communication Services

13.7%
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%

-

Healthcare

3.8%
9.4%

Industrials

2.9%
49.0%

Utilities

1.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Energy

0.5%
0.5%

Financial Services

0.2%
1.0%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Technology

EQQQ.L
59.0%
RBOT.TO
29.4%

Communication Services

EQQQ.L
13.7%
RBOT.TO
5.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EQQQ.L
10.9%
RBOT.TO
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

EQQQ.L
6.8%
RBOT.TO

-

Healthcare

EQQQ.L
3.8%
RBOT.TO
9.4%

Industrials

EQQQ.L
2.9%
RBOT.TO
49.0%

Utilities

EQQQ.L
1.2%
RBOT.TO

-

Basic Materials

EQQQ.L
1.1%
RBOT.TO

-

Energy

EQQQ.L
0.5%
RBOT.TO
0.5%

Financial Services

EQQQ.L
0.2%
RBOT.TO
1.0%

Real Estate

EQQQ.L
0.0%
RBOT.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF

Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF

Often compared with EQQQ.L:
EQQQ.L vs. QQQEQQQ.L vs. QQQMEQQQ.L vs. EQGB.LEQQQ.L vs. CNX1.LEQQQ.L vs. EQQU.LEQQQ.L vs. CSPX.LEQQQ.L vs. XNAQ.L
Often compared with RBOT.TO:
RBOT.TO vs. XAIXRBOT.TO vs. ROBORBOT.TO vs. RBTX.LRBOT.TO vs. AIQRBOT.TO vs. AIGO.TORBOT.TO vs. CNX1.LRBOT.TO vs. FBOT

Return for Risk

EQQQ.L vs. RBOT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO
RBOT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
RBOT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBOT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQQQ.L vs. RBOT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) and Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EQQQ.LRBOT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.45
0.69

+1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.23
1.10

+2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.14

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

0.92

+2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.90

2.77

+7.12

EQQQ.L vs. RBOT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the RBOT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQQQ.L and RBOT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQQQ.L vs. RBOT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQQQ.L drawdown since its inception was -65.36%, which is greater than RBOT.TO's maximum drawdown of -53.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQQ.L and RBOT.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EQQQ.LRBOT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.36%

-53.94%

-11.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-17.67%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.09%

-31.84%

+7.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.76%

-53.94%

+26.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.76%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.85%

-23.38%

+20.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.50%

-22.69%

+10.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

5.87%

-2.08%

Volatility

EQQQ.L vs. RBOT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) is 5.78%, while Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF (RBOT.TO) has a volatility of 8.65%. This indicates that EQQQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBOT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EQQQ.LRBOT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

8.65%

-2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

17.49%

-6.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.31%

23.85%

-8.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.23%

25.67%

-6.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

25.37%

-5.98%

EQQQ.L vs. RBOT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQQQ.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than RBOT.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQQQ.L vs. RBOT.TO - Dividend Comparison

EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, more than RBOT.TO's 0.13% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%
RBOT.TO
Global X Robotics & AI Index ETF		0.13%0.14%0.85%0.11%0.52%0.04%0.17%0.67%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

EQQQ.L and RBOT.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EQQQ.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RBOT.TO.

EQQQ.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while RBOT.TO is Robotics. EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while RBOT.TO tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EQQQ.L and 0.65% for RBOT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQQQ.L and RBOT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer