EQQQ.DE vs. CMOE.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EQQQ.DE (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) and CMOE.DE (Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - EQQQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while CMOE.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EQQQ.DE returned 24.54%/yr vs 13.22%/yr for CMOE.DE. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EQQQ.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for CMOE.DE.

Performance

EQQQ.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CMOE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQQQ.DE achieves a 20.52% return, which is significantly lower than CMOE.DE's 21.57% return.

EQQQ.DE

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 7.99%
• YTD: 20.52%
• 6M: 18.72%
• 1Y: 37.03%
• 3Y*: 24.54%
• 5Y*: 18.69%
• 10Y*: 21.28%

CMOE.DE

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -1.55%
• YTD: 21.57%
• 6M: 21.82%
• 1Y: 33.83%
• 3Y*: 13.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQQQ.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EQQQ.DE Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF	20.52%	6.94%	33.67%	51.32%	-17.67%
CMOE.DE Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc	21.57%	14.96%	2.92%	-9.62%	-0.48%

Correlation

The correlation between EQQQ.DE and CMOE.DE is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2022	0.07

The correlation between EQQQ.DE and CMOE.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EQQQ.DE vs. CMOE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQQQ.DE

EQQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 71
EQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
EQQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
EQQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EQQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
EQQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 62

CMOE.DE

CMOE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 63
CMOE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CMOE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
CMOE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CMOE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
CMOE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQQQ.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CMOE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQQQ.DE	CMOE.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	2.00	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	2.50	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.37	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.74	4.49	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.10	10.26	+0.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQQQ.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the CMOE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQQQ.DE and CMOE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQQQ.DE	CMOE.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.40	2.00	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.37	+0.43

Drawdowns

EQQQ.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -47.04%, which is greater than CMOE.DE's maximum drawdown of -29.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQQ.DE and CMOE.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQQQ.DE	CMOE.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.04%	-29.97%	-17.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.05%	-7.70%	-2.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.70%	-11.83%	-14.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	-5.48%	+4.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.35%	-19.33%	+11.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	3.38%	+0.01%

Volatility

EQQQ.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.DE) is 4.26%, while Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CMOE.DE) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that EQQQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMOE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQQQ.DE	CMOE.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.26%	5.18%	-0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.90%	15.26%	-4.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.64%	17.28%	-1.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.84%	16.62%	+3.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.65%	16.62%	+3.03%

EQQQ.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQQQ.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CMOE.DE's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQQQ.DE vs. CMOE.DE - Dividend Comparison

EQQQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, while CMOE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMOE.DE Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EQQQ.DE Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF	0.23%	0.29%	0.37%	0.39%	0.57%	0.25%	0.41%	0.54%	0.64%	0.68%	0.78%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQQQ.DE and CMOE.DE in my portfolio?

EQQQ.DE and CMOE.DE have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EQQQ.DE or CMOE.DE?

On fees, CMOE.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQQQ.DE or CMOE.DE?

CMOE.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQQ.DE.

What is the main difference between EQQQ.DE and CMOE.DE?

EQQQ.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while CMOE.DE is Commodities. EQQQ.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while CMOE.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.30% for EQQQ.DE and 0.24% for CMOE.DE.