CMOE.DE vs. VHVG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CMOE.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L).
CMOE.DE and VHVG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CMOE.DE is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity (EUR Hedged). It was launched on Aug 16, 2018. VHVG.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Sep 24, 2019. Both CMOE.DE and VHVG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CMOE.DE or VHVG.L.
Key characteristics
| CMOE.DE | VHVG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.22% | 9.56% |
| 1Y Return | 3.95% | 22.73% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.48 | 2.23 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.78% | 10.18% |
| Max Drawdown | -29.62% | -25.41% |
| Current Drawdown | -23.29% | -0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMOE.DE and VHVG.L is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CMOE.DE vs. VHVG.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CMOE.DE achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly lower than VHVG.L's 9.56% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMOE.DE vs. VHVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMOE.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than VHVG.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CMOE.DE vs. VHVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CMOE.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CMOE.DE vs. VHVG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CMOE.DE nor VHVG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CMOE.DE vs. VHVG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMOE.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.62%, which is greater than VHVG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMOE.DE and VHVG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CMOE.DE vs. VHVG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CMOE.DE) is 2.91%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that CMOE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VHVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.