PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQQD.L achieves a 19.77% return, which is significantly lower than XDWT.L's 24.10% return.


EQQD.L

1D
-0.73%
1M
8.59%
YTD
19.77%
6M
19.21%
1Y
40.52%
3Y*
28.25%
5Y*
10Y*

XDWT.L

1D
-1.87%
1M
13.92%
YTD
24.10%
6M
23.59%
1Y
51.40%
3Y*
32.85%
5Y*
21.37%
10Y*
24.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EQQD.L
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist
19.77%19.91%26.75%56.61%-33.32%15.15%
XDWT.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
24.10%22.42%33.90%54.82%-31.38%17.30%

Correlation

The correlation between EQQD.L and XDWT.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021

0.92

The correlation between EQQD.L and XDWT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQQD.L
XDWT.L

Technology

53.7%
99.1%

Communication Services

15.8%
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Healthcare

4.2%
0.1%

Industrials

3.1%
0.3%

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Energy

0.6%
0.1%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.1%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

EQQD.L
53.7%
XDWT.L
99.1%

Communication Services

EQQD.L
15.8%
XDWT.L
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EQQD.L
12.2%
XDWT.L

-

Consumer Defensive

EQQD.L
7.7%
XDWT.L

-

Healthcare

EQQD.L
4.2%
XDWT.L
0.1%

Industrials

EQQD.L
3.1%
XDWT.L
0.3%

Utilities

EQQD.L
1.4%
XDWT.L

-

Basic Materials

EQQD.L
1.1%
XDWT.L

-

Energy

EQQD.L
0.6%
XDWT.L
0.1%

Financial Services

EQQD.L
0.2%
XDWT.L
0.1%

Real Estate

EQQD.L
0.1%
XDWT.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQQD.L
EQQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EQQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWT.L
XDWT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQQD.LXDWT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.41

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

3.03

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.24

9.02

+4.22

EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQQD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the XDWT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQQD.L and XDWT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQQD.LXDWT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

2.51

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

1.11

-0.29

Drawdowns

EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQQD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWT.L drawdown of -35.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQD.L and XDWT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQQD.LXDWT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-35.99%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.18%

-16.86%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.85%

-26.10%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-2.66%

+1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.10%

-6.41%

-2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

5.68%

-2.63%

Volatility

EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L) is 5.03%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that EQQD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQQD.LXDWT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

7.39%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

15.71%

-4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.67%

20.39%

-4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.79%

23.62%

-2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.79%

22.09%

-1.30%

EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQQD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWT.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L - Dividend Comparison

EQQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while XDWT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
EQQD.L
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist
0.54%0.64%0.75%0.75%0.95%0.31%
XDWT.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, EQQD.L and XDWT.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EQQD.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQQD.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWT.L.

EQQD.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XDWT.L is Technology Equities. EQQD.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while XDWT.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EQQD.L and 0.25% for XDWT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQQD.L and XDWT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer