EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L
EQQD.L (Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist) and XDWT.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - EQQD.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while XDWT.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EQQD.L returned 28.25%/yr vs 32.85%/yr for XDWT.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQQD.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWT.L.
Performance
EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQQD.L achieves a 19.77% return, which is significantly lower than XDWT.L's 24.10% return.
EQQD.L
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 8.59%
- YTD
- 19.77%
- 6M
- 19.21%
- 1Y
- 40.52%
- 3Y*
- 28.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDWT.L
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 13.92%
- YTD
- 24.10%
- 6M
- 23.59%
- 1Y
- 51.40%
- 3Y*
- 32.85%
- 5Y*
- 21.37%
- 10Y*
- 24.28%
EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQD.L Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist | 19.77% | 19.91% | 26.75% | 56.61% | -33.32% | 15.15% |
XDWT.L Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C | 24.10% | 22.42% | 33.90% | 54.82% | -31.38% | 17.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQQD.L and XDWT.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021 | 0.92 |
The correlation between EQQD.L and XDWT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQQD.L
XDWT.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
EQQD.L
XDWT.L
Communication Services
EQQD.L
XDWT.L
Consumer Cyclical
EQQD.L
XDWT.L
-
Consumer Defensive
EQQD.L
XDWT.L
-
Healthcare
EQQD.L
XDWT.L
Industrials
EQQD.L
XDWT.L
Utilities
EQQD.L
XDWT.L
-
Basic Materials
EQQD.L
XDWT.L
-
Energy
EQQD.L
XDWT.L
Financial Services
EQQD.L
XDWT.L
Real Estate
EQQD.L
XDWT.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L — Risk / Return Rank
EQQD.L
XDWT.L
EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQQD.L | XDWT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.41 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 3.03 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.24 | 9.02 | +4.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQQD.L | XDWT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.51 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 1.11 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQQD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWT.L drawdown of -35.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQD.L and XDWT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQQD.L | XDWT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -35.99% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.18% | -16.86% | +5.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.85% | -26.10% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -2.66% | +1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.10% | -6.41% | -2.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 5.68% | -2.63% |
Volatility
EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L) is 5.03%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C (XDWT.L) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that EQQD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQQD.L | XDWT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 7.39% | -2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | 15.71% | -4.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.67% | 20.39% | -4.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 23.62% | -2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 22.09% | -1.30% |
EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQQD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWT.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EQQD.L vs. XDWT.L - Dividend Comparison
EQQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while XDWT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQD.L Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist | 0.54% | 0.64% | 0.75% | 0.75% | 0.95% | 0.31% |
XDWT.L Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, EQQD.L and XDWT.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EQQD.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EQQD.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWT.L.
EQQD.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XDWT.L is Technology Equities. EQQD.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD, while XDWT.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EQQD.L and 0.25% for XDWT.L.
Find the right allocation for EQQD.L and XDWT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer