EQQD.L vs. CNDX.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L).
EQQD.L and CNDX.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EQQD.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. It was launched on Jun 21, 2021. CNDX.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both EQQD.L and CNDX.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EQQD.L or CNDX.L.
Key characteristics
| EQQD.L | CNDX.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.08% | 9.95% |
| 1Y Return | 35.72% | 35.45% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.17 | 2.16 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.33% | 16.31% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.95% | -35.17% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.45% | -0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQQD.L and CNDX.L is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EQQD.L vs. CNDX.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EQQD.L having a 10.08% return and CNDX.L slightly lower at 9.95%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EQQD.L vs. CNDX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQQD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CNDX.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EQQD.L vs. CNDX.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EQQD.L vs. CNDX.L - Dividend Comparison
EQQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than CNDX.L's 0.06% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQD.L Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist | 0.74% | 0.75% | 0.95% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CNDX.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.06% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.07% | 0.06% | 0.30% | 0.16% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.16% |
Drawdowns
EQQD.L vs. CNDX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQQD.L drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, roughly equal to the maximum CNDX.L drawdown of -35.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQQD.L and CNDX.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EQQD.L vs. CNDX.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Dist (EQQD.L) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.L) have volatilities of 5.86% and 5.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.