EQPGX vs. AMRGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX).
EQPGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 22, 1983. AMRGX is managed by American Growth. It was launched on Jul 31, 1958.
Performance
EQPGX vs. AMRGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EQPGX vs. AMRGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQPGX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I | -4.21% | 14.60% | 29.99% | 35.60% | -24.45% | 22.94% | 43.80% | 34.01% | 0.17% | 35.19% |
AMRGX American Growth Fund Series One | 3.21% | 11.18% | 16.61% | 24.38% | -19.93% | 15.64% | 18.65% | 36.73% | -9.07% | 13.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQPGX achieves a -4.21% return, which is significantly lower than AMRGX's 3.21% return. Over the past 10 years, EQPGX has outperformed AMRGX with an annualized return of 17.20%, while AMRGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.90% annualized return.
EQPGX
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -2.67%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -4.04%
- 1Y
- 17.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- 17.20%
AMRGX
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -5.73%
- YTD
- 3.21%
- 6M
- 9.92%
- 1Y
- 20.19%
- 3Y*
- 15.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 10.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EQPGX vs. AMRGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQPGX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than AMRGX's 4.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EQPGX vs. AMRGX — Risk / Return Rank
EQPGX
AMRGX
EQPGX vs. AMRGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQPGX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 0.74 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 1.30 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.22 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.41 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.37 | 3.38 | +1.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQPGX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.74 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.37 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.51 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.10 | +0.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between EQPGX and AMRGX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EQPGX vs. AMRGX - Dividend Comparison
EQPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than AMRGX's 17.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQPGX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I | 0.55% | 0.52% | 10.64% | 0.48% | 1.96% | 11.42% | 10.84% | 8.56% | 6.43% | 11.57% | 5.90% | 2.21% |
AMRGX American Growth Fund Series One | 17.27% | 17.82% | 12.39% | 8.17% | 7.77% | 12.21% | 2.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EQPGX vs. AMRGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQPGX drawdown since its inception was -62.00%, smaller than the maximum AMRGX drawdown of -80.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQPGX and AMRGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQPGX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.00% | -80.32% | +18.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.57% | -13.98% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.81% | -35.42% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.11% | -35.42% | +4.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.64% | -10.04% | +2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.80% | -40.45% | +26.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 5.82% | -2.16% |
Volatility
EQPGX vs. AMRGX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class I (EQPGX) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX) at 7.12%. This indicates that EQPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMRGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EQPGX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.79% | 7.12% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.37% | 23.70% | -10.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.86% | 28.39% | -6.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.16% | 21.88% | -1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 21.32% | -0.83% |