PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQNIX vs. FBLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQNIX vs. FBLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Equity Income Fund (EQNIX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQNIX achieves a 13.93% return, which is significantly higher than FBLEX's 9.64% return. Over the past 10 years, EQNIX has outperformed FBLEX with an annualized return of 13.09%, while FBLEX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.34% annualized return.


EQNIX

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.65%
YTD
13.93%
6M
12.69%
1Y
25.96%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*
13.09%

FBLEX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.98%
YTD
9.64%
6M
8.59%
1Y
23.07%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQNIX vs. FBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQNIX
MFS Equity Income Fund
13.93%16.90%12.89%16.23%-6.97%26.35%8.59%25.72%-7.55%19.34%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
9.64%17.06%18.04%15.60%-4.82%26.83%4.34%25.57%-9.04%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between EQNIX and FBLEX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.93

The correlation between EQNIX and FBLEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQNIX vs. FBLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQNIX
EQNIX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EQNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
EQNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLEX
FBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQNIX vs. FBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Equity Income Fund (EQNIX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EQNIXFBLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.37

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

3.28

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.73

13.17

-0.44

EQNIX vs. FBLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQNIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the FBLEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQNIX and FBLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQNIX vs. FBLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQNIX drawdown since its inception was -36.60%, smaller than the maximum FBLEX drawdown of -39.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQNIX and FBLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQNIXFBLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.60%

-39.73%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.94%

-6.89%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.26%

-14.71%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.64%

-19.00%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.60%

-39.73%

+3.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-1.28%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-3.81%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

1.71%

+0.31%

Volatility

EQNIX vs. FBLEX - Volatility Comparison

MFS Equity Income Fund (EQNIX) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) at 3.39%. This indicates that EQNIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQNIXFBLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

3.39%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

8.23%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.85%

10.81%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.95%

14.79%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.11%

17.37%

-0.26%

EQNIX vs. FBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQNIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLEX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQNIX vs. FBLEX - Dividend Comparison

EQNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%, more than FBLEX's 10.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQNIX
MFS Equity Income Fund
10.68%12.17%6.60%4.05%6.24%8.38%3.71%2.29%7.27%4.75%2.42%2.89%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
10.13%9.95%12.63%5.05%12.66%14.51%3.85%5.65%10.97%7.09%2.47%13.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, EQNIX and FBLEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EQNIX has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to FBLEX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQNIX dropped -36.60% vs FBLEX's -39.73%.

EQNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQNIX and FBLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer