PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQL vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQL vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQL achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EQL having a 12.47% annualized return and SCHD not far ahead at 12.77%.


EQL

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.96%
YTD
8.83%
6M
9.12%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
16.48%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
12.47%

SCHD

1D
0.00%
1M
2.70%
YTD
19.01%
6M
18.63%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQL vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQL
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF
8.83%13.09%16.44%16.87%-10.72%29.32%10.87%27.87%-6.12%18.37%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between EQL and SCHD is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.88

The correlation between EQL and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EQL vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQL
SCHD

Technology

10.8%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
6.3%

Real Estate

9.3%

-

Communication Services

8.9%
6.3%

Utilities

8.9%
0.0%

Financial Services

8.9%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
19.2%

Industrials

8.7%
7.5%

Energy

8.6%
16.2%

Healthcare

8.6%
18.8%

Basic Materials

8.2%
1.2%

Technology

EQL
10.8%
SCHD
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EQL
10.5%
SCHD
6.3%

Real Estate

EQL
9.3%
SCHD

-

Communication Services

EQL
8.9%
SCHD
6.3%

Utilities

EQL
8.9%
SCHD
0.0%

Financial Services

EQL
8.9%
SCHD
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

EQL
8.7%
SCHD
19.2%

Industrials

EQL
8.7%
SCHD
7.5%

Energy

EQL
8.6%
SCHD
16.2%

Healthcare

EQL
8.6%
SCHD
18.8%

Basic Materials

EQL
8.2%
SCHD
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQL vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQL
EQL Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
EQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQL Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQL vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQLSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.45

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

5.91

-2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.93

14.53

-2.60

EQL vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQL Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQL and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQLSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.49

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.58

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.77

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.86

-0.01

Drawdowns

EQL vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQL drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQL and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQLSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.65%

-33.37%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.19%

-4.61%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.07%

-16.13%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.24%

-16.85%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.65%

-33.37%

-2.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-1.40%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-3.32%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

1.88%

-0.30%

Volatility

EQL vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) is 2.21%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that EQL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQLSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

2.66%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.82%

7.66%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.34%

10.96%

-1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

14.38%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

16.72%

-0.18%

EQL vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQL has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EQL vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

EQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQL
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF
1.62%1.73%1.78%1.96%2.14%1.69%2.29%1.95%2.39%1.97%2.89%2.07%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQL and SCHD have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to EQL (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQL dropped -35.65% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.77% vs 12.47% for EQL. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, EQL has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 12.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for EQL.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.62% for EQL.

EQL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for EQL and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQL and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer