PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQL vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQL vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQL achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 11.28% return. Over the past 10 years, EQL has underperformed SCHB with an annualized return of 12.47%, while SCHB has yielded a comparatively higher 15.04% annualized return.


EQL

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.96%
YTD
8.83%
6M
9.12%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
16.48%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
12.47%

SCHB

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.28%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQL vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQL
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF
8.83%13.09%16.44%16.87%-10.72%29.32%10.87%27.87%-6.12%18.37%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
11.28%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%30.79%-5.43%21.20%

Correlation

The correlation between EQL and SCHB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009

0.92

The correlation between EQL and SCHB shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EQL vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQL
SCHB

Technology

10.8%
34.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
10.1%

Real Estate

9.3%
2.4%

Communication Services

8.9%
10.1%

Utilities

8.9%
2.3%

Financial Services

8.9%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
4.6%

Industrials

8.7%
9.4%

Energy

8.6%
3.7%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.9%

Basic Materials

8.2%
2.0%

Technology

EQL
10.8%
SCHB
34.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EQL
10.5%
SCHB
10.1%

Real Estate

EQL
9.3%
SCHB
2.4%

Communication Services

EQL
8.9%
SCHB
10.1%

Utilities

EQL
8.9%
SCHB
2.3%

Financial Services

EQL
8.9%
SCHB
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

EQL
8.7%
SCHB
4.6%

Industrials

EQL
8.7%
SCHB
9.4%

Energy

EQL
8.6%
SCHB
3.7%

Healthcare

EQL
8.6%
SCHB
8.9%

Basic Materials

EQL
8.2%
SCHB
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQL vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQL
EQL Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
EQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQL Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQL vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQLSCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.42

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

3.17

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.93

14.55

-2.62

EQL vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQL Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQL and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQLSCHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.33

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.74

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.82

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.83

+0.02

Drawdowns

EQL vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQL drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQL and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQLSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.65%

-35.27%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.19%

-8.91%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.07%

-19.34%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.24%

-25.41%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.65%

-35.27%

-0.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-0.72%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-4.12%

+0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

1.94%

-0.36%

Volatility

EQL vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) is 2.21%, while Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a volatility of 3.01%. This indicates that EQL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQLSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

3.01%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.82%

9.14%

-2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.34%

12.12%

-2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

17.24%

-2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

18.32%

-1.78%

EQL vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQL has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EQL vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

EQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than SCHB's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQL
ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF
1.62%1.73%1.78%1.96%2.14%1.69%2.29%1.95%2.39%1.97%2.89%2.07%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.02%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQL and SCHB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHB has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to EQL (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQL dropped -35.65% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 10-year performance, SCHB leads with 15.04% vs 12.47% for EQL. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, EQL has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 15.04% return vs 12.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for EQL.

EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 1.02% for SCHB.

EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for EQL and 0.03% for SCHB.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQL and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer