EQL.TO vs. USSL.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EQL.TO (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD) and USSL.TO (Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQL.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while USSL.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EQL.TO returned 20.53% vs 37.15% for USSL.TO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EQL.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.34%/yr for USSL.TO.

Performance

EQL.TO vs. USSL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) and Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF (USSL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQL.TO achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly lower than USSL.TO's 14.51% return.

EQL.TO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 5.96%
• YTD: 10.79%
• 6M: 9.50%
• 1Y: 20.53%
• 3Y*: 20.00%
• 5Y*: 16.55%
• 10Y*: —

USSL.TO

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 8.62%
• YTD: 14.51%
• 6M: 12.52%
• 1Y: 37.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQL.TO vs. USSL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EQL.TO Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD	10.79%	5.94%	14.46%
USSL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF	14.51%	13.42%	22.04%

Correlation

The correlation between EQL.TO and USSL.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2024	0.37

The correlation between EQL.TO and USSL.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EQL.TO vs. USSL.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EQL.TO	USSL.TO
Technology	18.3%	33.1%
Industrials	14.7%	8.7%
Financial Services	14.4%	12.3%
Healthcare	10.9%	9.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	5.4%
Real Estate	6.2%	2.0%
Utilities	6.1%	2.5%
Energy	4.6%	3.5%
Basic Materials	4.1%	1.9%
Communication Services	4.0%	10.7%

Return for Risk

EQL.TO vs. USSL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQL.TO

EQL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 54
EQL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
EQL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
EQL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 48
EQL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
EQL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 61

USSL.TO

USSL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 81
USSL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
USSL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
USSL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 95
USSL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
USSL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQL.TO vs. USSL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) and Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF (USSL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQL.TO	USSL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.65	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	4.04	-1.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.73	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	3.46	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.94	12.89	-1.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQL.TO vs. USSL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the USSL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQL.TO and USSL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQL.TO	USSL.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	2.65	-0.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	1.30	-0.25

Drawdowns

EQL.TO vs. USSL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQL.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.47%, which is greater than USSL.TO's maximum drawdown of -23.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQL.TO and USSL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQL.TO	USSL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.47%	-23.90%	-6.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.73%	-10.79%	+4.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-0.03%	-0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.19%	-3.48%	+0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	2.89%	-1.01%

Volatility

EQL.TO vs. USSL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) is 3.86%, while Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF (USSL.TO) has a volatility of 5.02%. This indicates that EQL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USSL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQL.TO	USSL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.86%	5.02%	-1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.98%	10.67%	-1.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.99%	14.08%	-2.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.54%	19.63%	-5.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.35%	19.63%	-2.28%

EQL.TO vs. USSL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQL.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than USSL.TO's 1.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQL.TO vs. USSL.TO - Dividend Comparison

EQL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while USSL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EQL.TO Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD	1.26%	1.38%	5.37%	8.14%	8.91%	7.19%	9.96%	8.29%	1.35%
USSL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQL.TO and USSL.TO in my portfolio?

EQL.TO and USSL.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EQL.TO or USSL.TO?

On fees, EQL.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQL.TO or USSL.TO?

EQL.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.34% for USSL.TO.

What is the main difference between EQL.TO and USSL.TO?

EQL.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while USSL.TO is Leveraged Equities. EQL.TO tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while USSL.TO tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EQL.TO and 1.34% for USSL.TO.