PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQL.TO vs. PSB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQL.TO vs. PSB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) and Invesco 1-5 Year Laddered Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (PSB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQL.TO achieves a 14.27% return, which is significantly higher than PSB.TO's 1.60% return.


EQL.TO

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.63%
6M
9.05%
YTD
14.27%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*

PSB.TO

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.01%
6M
1.04%
YTD
1.60%
1Y
4.40%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
2.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQL.TO vs. PSB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EQL.TO
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD
14.27%5.94%21.81%11.36%-6.24%28.55%10.48%22.62%-4.47%
PSB.TO
Invesco 1-5 Year Laddered Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.60%4.68%7.08%6.44%-3.89%-0.97%6.08%4.25%1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between EQL.TO and PSB.TO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2018

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQL.TO vs. PSB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQL.TO
EQL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EQL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EQL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

PSB.TO
PSB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PSB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PSB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQL.TO vs. PSB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) and Invesco 1-5 Year Laddered Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (PSB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EQL.TOPSB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.29

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

3.20

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.14

9.77

+1.37

EQL.TO vs. PSB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the PSB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQL.TO and PSB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQL.TO vs. PSB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQL.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.08%, which is greater than PSB.TO's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQL.TO and PSB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQL.TOPSB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.08%

-13.24%

-19.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.73%

-1.38%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.25%

-1.89%

-15.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.73%

-7.93%

-10.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-0.17%

-2.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-1.00%

-2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

0.45%

+1.45%

Volatility

EQL.TO vs. PSB.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD (EQL.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to Invesco 1-5 Year Laddered Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (PSB.TO) at 0.67%. This indicates that EQL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQL.TOPSB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

0.67%

+2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

1.96%

+7.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.15%

2.76%

+9.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

3.32%

+11.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

4.85%

+12.03%

EQL.TO vs. PSB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQL.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PSB.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQL.TO vs. PSB.TO - Dividend Comparison

EQL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than PSB.TO's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQL.TO
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF CAD
1.26%1.38%1.29%1.39%1.51%1.30%2.00%1.49%1.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSB.TO
Invesco 1-5 Year Laddered Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF
3.20%3.18%3.12%3.09%3.13%2.91%2.74%3.00%3.37%3.61%4.01%4.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQL.TO and PSB.TO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EQL.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQL.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for PSB.TO.

EQL.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while PSB.TO is Corporate Bonds. EQL.TO tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while PSB.TO tracks FTSE Canada Investment Grade 1-5 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for EQL.TO and 0.28% for PSB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQL.TO and PSB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer