PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSB.TO vs. ZIC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSB.TO vs. ZIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco 1-5 Year Laddered Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (PSB.TO) and BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSB.TO achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than ZIC.TO's 4.10% return. Over the past 10 years, PSB.TO has underperformed ZIC.TO with an annualized return of 2.68%, while ZIC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 3.54% annualized return.


PSB.TO

1D
0.11%
1M
0.21%
6M
1.49%
YTD
1.49%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
6.00%
5Y*
2.96%
10Y*
2.68%

ZIC.TO

1D
0.37%
1M
3.00%
6M
4.26%
YTD
4.10%
1Y
9.55%
3Y*
8.87%
5Y*
3.94%
10Y*
3.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSB.TO vs. ZIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSB.TO
Invesco 1-5 Year Laddered Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.49%4.68%7.08%6.44%-3.89%-0.97%6.08%4.25%1.59%0.23%
ZIC.TO
BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF
4.10%4.46%11.87%6.34%-8.92%-1.35%6.52%9.04%6.41%-1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between PSB.TO and ZIC.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2013

0.32

The correlation between PSB.TO and ZIC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.42 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSB.TO vs. ZIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSB.TO
PSB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PSB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PSB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

ZIC.TO
ZIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ZIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ZIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSB.TO vs. ZIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco 1-5 Year Laddered Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (PSB.TO) and BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSB.TOZIC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

2.36

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.23

5.14

+3.09

PSB.TO vs. ZIC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the ZIC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSB.TO and ZIC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSB.TO vs. ZIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSB.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.24%, smaller than the maximum ZIC.TO drawdown of -19.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSB.TO and ZIC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSB.TOZIC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.24%

-19.48%

+6.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.38%

-4.06%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.89%

-6.96%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.93%

-15.65%

+7.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.24%

-19.48%

+6.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.26%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.00%

-5.11%

+4.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

1.86%

-1.40%

Volatility

PSB.TO vs. ZIC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco 1-5 Year Laddered Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (PSB.TO) is 0.61%, while BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZIC.TO) has a volatility of 1.53%. This indicates that PSB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSB.TOZIC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

1.53%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.91%

4.27%

-2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77%

5.47%

-2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.31%

7.94%

-4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.85%

8.87%

-4.02%

PSB.TO vs. ZIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSB.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than ZIC.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSB.TO vs. ZIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

PSB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than ZIC.TO's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSB.TO
Invesco 1-5 Year Laddered Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF
3.21%3.18%3.12%3.09%3.13%2.91%2.74%3.00%3.37%3.61%4.01%4.04%
ZIC.TO
BMO Mid-Term US Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index ETF
4.26%4.03%3.80%3.85%3.94%3.53%3.46%3.57%3.46%3.33%3.29%3.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSB.TO and ZIC.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZIC.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZIC.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for PSB.TO.

PSB.TO tracks FTSE Canada Investment Grade 1-5 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index, while ZIC.TO tracks Bloomberg US Investment Grade 5 to 10 Year Corporate Bond Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for PSB.TO and 0.25% for ZIC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSB.TO and ZIC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer