EQH vs. GMAB
EQH (Equitable Holdings, Inc.) and GMAB (Genmab A/S) are both stocks. EQH operates in Insurance - Diversified (Financial Services), while GMAB operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, EQH returned 9.89%/yr vs -10.53%/yr for GMAB. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EQH vs. GMAB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQH achieves a -6.30% return, which is significantly higher than GMAB's -18.57% return.
EQH
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- -6.30%
- 6M
- -7.48%
- 1Y
- -12.50%
- 3Y*
- 20.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- —
GMAB
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- YTD
- -18.57%
- 6M
- -19.90%
- 1Y
- 9.90%
- 3Y*
- -13.28%
- 5Y*
- -10.53%
- 10Y*
- 4.28%
EQH vs. GMAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQH Equitable Holdings, Inc. | -6.30% | 3.17% | 45.04% | 19.63% | -10.17% | 31.00% | 6.52% | 53.13% | -14.75% |
GMAB Genmab A/S | -18.57% | 47.58% | -34.45% | -24.87% | 7.13% | -2.71% | 82.09% | 35.54% | -18.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQH and GMAB is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2018 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
EQH:
-$3.67
GMAB:
$4.10
EQH:
0.87
GMAB:
1.81
EQH:
$11.32B
GMAB:
$8.84B
EQH:
$6.96B
GMAB:
$8.27B
EQH:
-$759.00M
GMAB:
$3.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQH vs. GMAB — Risk / Return Rank
EQH
GMAB
EQH vs. GMAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Equitable Holdings, Inc. (EQH) and Genmab A/S (GMAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EQH | GMAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.07 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 0.27 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.82 | 0.58 | -1.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EQH vs. GMAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQH drawdown since its inception was -61.33%, smaller than the maximum GMAB drawdown of -84.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQH and GMAB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQH | GMAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.33% | -84.20% | +22.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.85% | -32.51% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.85% | -57.44% | +21.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.85% | -63.10% | +27.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.51% | -48.52% | +29.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -31.09% | +18.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.23% | 14.86% | +3.37% |
Volatility
EQH vs. GMAB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Equitable Holdings, Inc. (EQH) is 9.41%, while Genmab A/S (GMAB) has a volatility of 12.15%. This indicates that EQH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQH | GMAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.41% | 12.15% | -2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.38% | 25.57% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.86% | 34.45% | -2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.05% | 33.47% | -0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.75% | 35.19% | +3.56% |
Dividends
EQH vs. GMAB - Dividend Comparison
EQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, while GMAB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQH Equitable Holdings, Inc. | 2.52% | 2.20% | 1.99% | 2.58% | 2.72% | 2.17% | 2.58% | 2.34% | 1.56% |
GMAB Genmab A/S | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
EQH vs. GMAB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Equitable Holdings, Inc. and Genmab A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EQH vs. GMAB - Profitability Comparison
EQH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equitable Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.61B and revenue of 4.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.2%.
GMAB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genmab A/S reported a gross profit of 834.08M and revenue of 899.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.8%.
EQH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equitable Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
GMAB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genmab A/S reported an operating income of 225.83M and revenue of 899.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.1%.
EQH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equitable Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 621.00M and revenue of 4.23B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
GMAB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genmab A/S reported a net income of 53.20M and revenue of 899.32M, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EQH and GMAB have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMAB has higher volatility (12.15%) compared to EQH (9.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQH dropped -61.33% vs GMAB's -84.20%.
GMAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQH and GMAB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer