EQGB.L vs. XNAS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EQGB.L (Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc) and XNAS.L (Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, from Invesco and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EQGB.L returned 27.25%/yr vs 25.15%/yr for XNAS.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQGB.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAS.L.

Performance

EQGB.L vs. XNAS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EQGB.L is traded in GBp, while XNAS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XNAS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQGB.L achieves a 18.86% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.L's 20.93% return.

EQGB.L

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 8.42%
• YTD: 18.86%
• 6M: 18.41%
• 1Y: 39.13%
• 3Y*: 27.25%
• 5Y*: 16.35%
• 10Y*: —

XNAS.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 10.24%
• YTD: 20.93%
• 6M: 19.10%
• 1Y: 42.68%
• 3Y*: 25.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQGB.L vs. XNAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc	18.86%	19.59%	26.12%	53.92%	-2.35%
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF	20.16%	11.29%	28.81%	48.59%	-8.32%

Correlation

The correlation between EQGB.L and XNAS.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2022	0.88

The correlation between EQGB.L and XNAS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

EQGB.L vs. XNAS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EQGB.L	XNAS.L
Technology	53.6%	53.7%
Communication Services	15.8%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	12.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	7.7%
Healthcare	4.2%	4.2%
Industrials	3.1%	3.1%
Utilities	1.4%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.1%
Energy	0.6%	0.6%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

EQGB.L vs. XNAS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQGB.L

EQGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
EQGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
EQGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
EQGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EQGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
EQGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 68

XNAS.L

XNAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
XNAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
XNAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 75
XNAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
XNAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQGB.L vs. XNAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQGB.L	XNAS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	2.68	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	3.56	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.48	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	3.82	-0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.32	10.85	+1.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQGB.L vs. XNAS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQGB.L and XNAS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQGB.L	XNAS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46	2.68	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	1.41	-0.50

Drawdowns

EQGB.L vs. XNAS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQGB.L drawdown since its inception was -36.77%, which is greater than XNAS.L's maximum drawdown of -24.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQGB.L and XNAS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQGB.L	XNAS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.77%	-24.49%	-12.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.33%	-11.08%	-0.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.76%	-24.49%	+1.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.81%	0.00%	-0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.52%	-3.85%	-3.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	3.91%	-0.74%

Volatility

EQGB.L vs. XNAS.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) have volatilities of 4.92% and 4.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQGB.L	XNAS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.92%	4.93%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.88%	11.49%	+0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.81%	15.78%	+0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.95%	18.98%	+1.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.25%	18.98%	+2.27%

EQGB.L vs. XNAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQGB.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.L's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQGB.L vs. XNAS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EQGB.L nor XNAS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.04%
XNAS.L Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQGB.L and XNAS.L in my portfolio?

EQGB.L and XNAS.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EQGB.L or XNAS.L?

On fees, XNAS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQGB.L or XNAS.L?

XNAS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQGB.L.

What is the main difference between EQGB.L and XNAS.L?

Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQGB.L and 0.20% for XNAS.L.