EQGB.L vs. ICLU.L
EQGB.L (Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc) and ICLU.L (Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - EQGB.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while ICLU.L is a CLO fund actively managed by Invesco. EQGB.L is passively managed, while ICLU.L is actively managed. Over the past year, EQGB.L returned 39.13% vs 6.19% for ICLU.L. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. EQGB.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ICLU.L.
Performance
EQGB.L vs. ICLU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EQGB.L is traded in GBp, while ICLU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICLU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQGB.L achieves a 18.86% return, which is significantly higher than ICLU.L's 2.60% return.
EQGB.L
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 8.42%
- YTD
- 18.86%
- 6M
- 18.41%
- 1Y
- 39.13%
- 3Y*
- 27.25%
- 5Y*
- 16.35%
- 10Y*
- —
ICLU.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 6.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQGB.L vs. ICLU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc | 18.86% | 17.14% |
ICLU.L Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc | 2.60% | -4.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQGB.L and ICLU.L is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQGB.L vs. ICLU.L — Risk / Return Rank
EQGB.L
ICLU.L
EQGB.L vs. ICLU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) and Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc (ICLU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQGB.L | ICLU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.16 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 1.30 | +2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.32 | 3.60 | +8.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQGB.L | ICLU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 0.92 | +1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | -0.20 | +1.11 |
Drawdowns
EQGB.L vs. ICLU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQGB.L drawdown since its inception was -36.77%, which is greater than ICLU.L's maximum drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQGB.L and ICLU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQGB.L | ICLU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.77% | -8.54% | -28.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.33% | -4.76% | -6.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -1.85% | +1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.52% | -4.51% | -3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 1.72% | +1.45% |
Volatility
EQGB.L vs. ICLU.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc (ICLU.L) at 1.86%. This indicates that EQGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICLU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQGB.L | ICLU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 1.86% | +3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.88% | 5.09% | +6.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.81% | 6.72% | +9.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.95% | 7.23% | +13.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 7.23% | +14.02% |
EQGB.L vs. ICLU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQGB.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLU.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQGB.L vs. ICLU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EQGB.L nor ICLU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% |
ICLU.L Invesco USD AAA CLO UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQGB.L and ICLU.L have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICLU.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICLU.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQGB.L.
EQGB.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ICLU.L is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQGB.L and 0.25% for ICLU.L.
Find the right allocation for EQGB.L and ICLU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer