PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EQDS.L vs. EDIV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EQDS.L vs. EDIV.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EQDS.L (iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) and EDIV.L (Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) are both Europe Equities funds - EQDS.L tracks the MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR while EDIV.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EQDS.L returned 7.40%/yr vs 11.74%/yr for EDIV.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQDS.L charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EDIV.L.

Performance

EQDS.L vs. EDIV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EQDS.L) and Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EDIV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EQDS.L is traded in GBp, while EDIV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EDIV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQDS.L achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than EDIV.L's 4.01% return.

EQDS.L

1D
0.54%
1M
0.43%
YTD
2.43%
6M
3.65%
1Y
6.98%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
—

EDIV.L

1D
0.35%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
4.01%
6M
5.33%
1Y
8.63%
3Y*
11.74%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQDS.L vs. EDIV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EQDS.L
iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		2.43%13.04%2.83%8.89%2.95%-0.02%
EDIV.L
Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc		4.01%22.12%4.15%13.54%-8.59%-2.44%

Correlation

The correlation between EQDS.L and EDIV.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2021

0.86

The correlation between EQDS.L and EDIV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

EQDS.L vs. EDIV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EQDS.L
EDIV.L

Financial Services

28.6%
24.7%

Industrials

17.4%
19.6%

Consumer Defensive

12.0%
7.6%

Utilities

10.7%
17.6%

Healthcare

8.1%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
1.8%

Energy

4.8%
1.6%

Communication Services

4.3%
7.0%

Technology

3.7%
3.8%

Real Estate

3.3%
1.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
6.7%

Financial Services

EQDS.L
28.6%
EDIV.L
24.7%

Industrials

EQDS.L
17.4%
EDIV.L
19.6%

Consumer Defensive

EQDS.L
12.0%
EDIV.L
7.6%

Utilities

EQDS.L
10.7%
EDIV.L
17.6%

Healthcare

EQDS.L
8.1%
EDIV.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EQDS.L
5.5%
EDIV.L
1.8%

Energy

EQDS.L
4.8%
EDIV.L
1.6%

Communication Services

EQDS.L
4.3%
EDIV.L
7.0%

Technology

EQDS.L
3.7%
EDIV.L
3.8%

Real Estate

EQDS.L
3.3%
EDIV.L
1.1%

Basic Materials

EQDS.L
1.7%
EDIV.L
6.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)

Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc

Often compared with EQDS.L:
EQDS.L vs. VHYL.ASEQDS.L vs. FLXD.LEQDS.L vs. IQQA.DEEQDS.L vs. LDEG.LEQDS.L vs. CB5.LEQDS.L vs. SCHDEQDS.L vs. VYM
Often compared with EDIV.L:
EDIV.L vs. PRUK.LEDIV.L vs. MIVO.LEDIV.L vs. EUDV.LEDIV.L vs. LCPE.LEDIV.L vs. MMS.LEDIV.L vs. CS1.LEDIV.L vs. EEIP.L

Return for Risk

EQDS.L vs. EDIV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EQDS.L
EQDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
EQDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
EQDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
EDIV.L
EDIV.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
EDIV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQDS.L vs. EDIV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EQDS.L) and Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EDIV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EQDS.LEDIV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.64
0.80

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.95
1.13

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.15

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

0.97

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.20

3.14

-0.94

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQDS.L vs. EDIV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQDS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the EDIV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQDS.L and EDIV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EQDS.LEDIV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

0.80

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.45

-0.24

Drawdowns

EQDS.L vs. EDIV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQDS.L drawdown since its inception was -32.52%, which is greater than EDIV.L's maximum drawdown of -22.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQDS.L and EDIV.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EQDS.LEDIV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.52%

-22.80%

-9.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.60%

-8.91%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.33%

-10.13%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.74%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.20%

-3.96%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.28%

-5.26%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

2.74%

+0.43%

Volatility

EQDS.L vs. EDIV.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EQDS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EDIV.L) at 3.03%. This indicates that EQDS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EQDS.LEDIV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.03%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.67%

8.95%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.95%

10.82%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.56%

14.01%

-1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.79%

14.01%

+0.78%

EQDS.L vs. EDIV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQDS.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than EDIV.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQDS.L vs. EDIV.L - Dividend Comparison

EQDS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while EDIV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EDIV.L
Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EQDS.L
iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		0.03%0.03%0.03%0.04%0.04%0.05%0.03%0.05%0.05%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

EQDS.L and EDIV.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EQDS.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQDS.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EDIV.L.

EQDS.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR, while EDIV.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for EQDS.L and 0.30% for EDIV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQDS.L and EDIV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer