EDIV.L vs. LCPE.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EDIV.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L).
EDIV.L and LCPE.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EDIV.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU NR EUR. It was launched on Mar 10, 2020. LCPE.L is a passively managed fund by Natixis that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Dec 30, 2014. Both EDIV.L and LCPE.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EDIV.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EDIV.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV.L Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | 4.32% | 22.12% | 4.15% | 13.54% | -8.59% | -2.44% |
LCPE.L Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS | 8.92% | 18.88% | -2.83% | 10.70% | 0.29% | 3.54% |
Different Trading Currencies
EDIV.L is traded in GBP, while LCPE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LCPE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDIV.L achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 8.92% return.
EDIV.L
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -1.69%
- YTD
- 4.32%
- 6M
- 6.74%
- 1Y
- 14.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCPE.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 15.49%
- 1Y
- 23.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EDIV.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDIV.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EDIV.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank
EDIV.L
LCPE.L
EDIV.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EDIV.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EDIV.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 1.86 | -0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 2.40 | -0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.36 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 2.00 | -0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.83 | 8.53 | -2.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EDIV.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.86 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.95 | -0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between EDIV.L and LCPE.L is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EDIV.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EDIV.L nor LCPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EDIV.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDIV.L drawdown since its inception was -22.80%, smaller than the maximum LCPE.L drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV.L and LCPE.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EDIV.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.80% | -27.05% | +4.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -8.37% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -1.95% | -1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -3.61% | -1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.37% | +0.24% |
Volatility
EDIV.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EDIV.L) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) at 4.11%. This indicates that EDIV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EDIV.L | LCPE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 4.11% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.62% | 8.18% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.63% | 13.12% | -0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.12% | 18.01% | -3.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.12% | 20.83% | -6.71% |