EDIV.L vs. MMS.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EDIV.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L).

EDIV.L and MMS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EDIV.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU NR EUR. It was launched on Mar 10, 2020. MMS.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. It was launched on Sep 7, 2017. Both EDIV.L and MMS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

EDIV.L vs. MMS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EDIV.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EDIV.L vs. MMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EDIV.L Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc	4.32%	22.12%	4.10%
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Returns By Period

EDIV.L

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: -1.69%
• YTD: 4.32%
• 6M: 6.74%
• 1Y: 14.87%
• 3Y*: 11.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MMS.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EDIV.L vs. MMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EDIV.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MMS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

MMS.L

Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist

EDIV.L

Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc

Return for Risk

EDIV.L vs. MMS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EDIV.L

EDIV.L Risk / Return Rank: 58
EDIV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
EDIV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
EDIV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 58
EDIV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EDIV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EDIV.L vs. MMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EDIV.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EDIV.L	MMS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.83	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EDIV.L	MMS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	—	—

Dividends

EDIV.L vs. MMS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EDIV.L nor MMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

EDIV.L vs. MMS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EDIV.L drawdown since its inception was -22.80%, which is greater than MMS.L's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDIV.L and MMS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EDIV.L	MMS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.80%	0.00%	-22.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	0.00%	-8.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.68%	0.00%	-3.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.35%	0.00%	-5.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	0.00%	+2.61%

Volatility

EDIV.L vs. MMS.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor S&P Eurozone ESG Dividend Aristocrats (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (EDIV.L) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L) at 0.00%. This indicates that EDIV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EDIV.L	MMS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.60%	0.00%	+4.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.62%	0.00%	+8.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.63%	0.00%	+12.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.12%	0.00%	+14.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.12%	0.00%	+14.12%