PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EQDS.L vs. CMU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EQDS.L vs. CMU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EQDS.L (iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds - EQDS.L tracks the MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR while CMU.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EQDS.L returned 6.53%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for CMU.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQDS.L charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.

Performance

EQDS.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EQDS.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQDS.L achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return.

EQDS.L

1D
0.54%
1M
0.43%
YTD
2.43%
6M
3.65%
1Y
6.98%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
—

CMU.L

1D
0.33%
1M
8.13%
YTD
15.89%
6M
17.12%
1Y
29.56%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQDS.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQDS.L
iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		2.43%13.04%2.83%8.89%2.95%6.17%-8.39%13.33%-9.12%-0.84%
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select		15.89%25.71%1.42%14.39%-5.30%13.03%4.59%19.05%-11.56%1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between EQDS.L and CMU.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.86

The correlation between EQDS.L and CMU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EQDS.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EQDS.L
CMU.L

Financial Services

28.6%
21.8%

Industrials

17.4%
15.7%

Consumer Defensive

12.0%
5.2%

Utilities

10.7%
5.8%

Healthcare

8.1%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
10.1%

Energy

4.8%
0.0%

Communication Services

4.3%
2.3%

Technology

3.7%
30.8%

Real Estate

3.3%
1.3%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.8%

Financial Services

EQDS.L
28.6%
CMU.L
21.8%

Industrials

EQDS.L
17.4%
CMU.L
15.7%

Consumer Defensive

EQDS.L
12.0%
CMU.L
5.2%

Utilities

EQDS.L
10.7%
CMU.L
5.8%

Healthcare

EQDS.L
8.1%
CMU.L
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EQDS.L
5.5%
CMU.L
10.1%

Energy

EQDS.L
4.8%
CMU.L
0.0%

Communication Services

EQDS.L
4.3%
CMU.L
2.3%

Technology

EQDS.L
3.7%
CMU.L
30.8%

Real Estate

EQDS.L
3.3%
CMU.L
1.3%

Basic Materials

EQDS.L
1.7%
CMU.L
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)

Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select

Often compared with EQDS.L:
EQDS.L vs. VHYL.ASEQDS.L vs. FLXD.LEQDS.L vs. IQQA.DEEQDS.L vs. LDEG.LEQDS.L vs. CB5.LEQDS.L vs. SCHDEQDS.L vs. VYM
Often compared with CMU.L:
CMU.L vs. CEUR.LCMU.L vs. GLDCMU.L vs. UB06.LCMU.L vs. FLXD.LCMU.L vs. 100D.LCMU.L vs. 500U.LCMU.L vs. BNKE.L

Return for Risk

EQDS.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EQDS.L
EQDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
EQDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
EQDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
CMU.L
CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQDS.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EQDS.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EQDS.LCMU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.64
1.98

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.95
2.79

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.37

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

2.58

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.20

9.67

-7.47

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQDS.L vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQDS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQDS.L and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EQDS.LCMU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

1.98

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.66

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.65

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.49

-0.27

Drawdowns

EQDS.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQDS.L drawdown since its inception was -32.52%, roughly equal to the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQDS.L and CMU.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EQDS.LCMU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.52%

-32.53%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.60%

-11.43%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.33%

-11.95%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.74%

-21.11%

+8.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-31.41%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.20%

-0.18%

-4.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.28%

-5.80%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

3.05%

+0.12%

Volatility

EQDS.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EQDS.L) is 3.32%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that EQDS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EQDS.LCMU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

5.34%

-2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.67%

12.44%

-3.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.95%

14.86%

-3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.56%

16.00%

-3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.79%

16.78%

-1.99%

EQDS.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQDS.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

EQDS.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

EQDS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EQDS.L
iShares MSCI Europe Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)		0.03%0.03%0.03%0.04%0.04%0.05%0.03%0.05%0.05%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

EQDS.L and CMU.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for EQDS.L.

EQDS.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR, while CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for EQDS.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQDS.L and CMU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer