EQCHX vs. GFIRX
EQCHX (AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I) and GFIRX (Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund) are both Systematic Trend funds. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EQCHX charges 1.91%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for GFIRX.
Performance
EQCHX vs. GFIRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EQCHX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFIRX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 8.36%
- 1Y
- 18.25%
- 3Y*
- 0.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.36%
- 10Y*
- 3.34%
EQCHX vs. GFIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQCHX AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I | 0.83% | -8.09% | -3.79% | -8.07% | 20.13% | 12.28% | 6.96% | -2.56% | -12.91% | 15.11% |
GFIRX Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 8.13% | 0.54% | -5.17% | -3.87% | 20.44% | 4.86% | 6.94% | 2.61% | -2.24% | 2.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQCHX and GFIRX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013 | 0.62 |
The correlation between EQCHX and GFIRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQCHX vs. GFIRX — Risk / Return Rank
EQCHX
GFIRX
EQCHX vs. GFIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I (EQCHX) and Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQCHX | GFIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.29 | — |
Drawdowns
EQCHX vs. GFIRX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQCHX | GFIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -23.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -5.36% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -7.02% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.49% | — |
Volatility
EQCHX vs. GFIRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQCHX | GFIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 7.74% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 10.39% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 9.05% | — |
EQCHX vs. GFIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQCHX has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than GFIRX's 1.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQCHX vs. GFIRX - Dividend Comparison
Neither EQCHX nor GFIRX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQCHX AXS Chesapeake Strategy Fund Class I | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 1.82% | 1.54% | 20.40% | 0.00% | 3.86% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.34% |
GFIRX Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.11% | 7.35% | 1.21% | 7.06% | 0.16% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 3.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQCHX and GFIRX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EQCHX and GFIRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer