PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQAL vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQAL vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQAL achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 14.47% return. Over the past 10 years, EQAL has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 10.85%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.95% annualized return.


EQAL

1D
-0.25%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
11.42%
6M
10.52%
1Y
22.33%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*
10.85%

VTV

1D
-0.56%
1M
3.10%
YTD
14.47%
6M
13.93%
1Y
27.19%
3Y*
18.66%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
12.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQAL vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EQAL
Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF
11.42%11.05%11.38%11.98%-13.49%23.14%16.57%24.54%-9.22%17.36%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
14.47%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between EQAL and VTV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2014

0.89

The correlation between EQAL and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

EQAL vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQAL
VTV

Technology

16.6%
16.4%

Healthcare

9.4%
14.1%

Industrials

9.4%
13.9%

Financial Services

9.2%
21.5%

Real Estate

9.2%
2.7%

Energy

8.3%
7.4%

Basic Materials

8.0%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
8.9%

Utilities

7.5%
4.8%

Communication Services

7.2%
3.1%

Technology

EQAL
16.6%
VTV
16.4%

Healthcare

EQAL
9.4%
VTV
14.1%

Industrials

EQAL
9.4%
VTV
13.9%

Financial Services

EQAL
9.2%
VTV
21.5%

Real Estate

EQAL
9.2%
VTV
2.7%

Energy

EQAL
8.3%
VTV
7.4%

Basic Materials

EQAL
8.0%
VTV
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EQAL
7.7%
VTV
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

EQAL
7.7%
VTV
8.9%

Utilities

EQAL
7.5%
VTV
4.8%

Communication Services

EQAL
7.2%
VTV
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQAL vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQAL
EQAL Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EQAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
EQAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQAL vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EQALVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.47

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

4.30

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.68

16.20

-4.52

EQAL vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQAL and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQAL vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQAL drawdown since its inception was -40.44%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQAL and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQALVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.44%

-59.27%

+18.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.67%

-6.35%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.62%

-14.52%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.79%

-17.04%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.44%

-36.78%

-3.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-0.56%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-7.85%

+2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.68%

+0.24%

Volatility

EQAL vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) have volatilities of 3.52% and 3.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQALVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

3.41%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.85%

7.85%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.47%

10.39%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.28%

13.88%

+3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

16.65%

+2.19%

EQAL vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQAL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EQAL vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

EQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than VTV's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQAL
Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF
1.72%1.79%1.62%1.88%1.95%1.32%1.63%1.61%1.62%1.18%1.57%1.64%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.83%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQAL and VTV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EQAL has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to VTV (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQAL dropped -40.44% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.95% vs 10.85% for EQAL. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.95% return vs 10.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EQAL.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.72% for EQAL.

EQAL is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. EQAL tracks Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EQAL and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQAL and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer