EQAL vs. USMF
EQAL (Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF) and USMF (WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - EQAL tracks the Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index while USMF tracks the WisdomTree US Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EQAL returned 6.86%/yr vs 7.67%/yr for USMF. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQAL charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for USMF.
Performance
EQAL vs. USMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQAL achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly higher than USMF's 4.36% return.
EQAL
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 12.35%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 24.33%
- 3Y*
- 15.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
USMF
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 4.36%
- 6M
- 4.80%
- 1Y
- 6.28%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- —
EQAL vs. USMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQAL Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF | 12.35% | 11.05% | 11.38% | 11.98% | -13.49% | 23.14% | 16.57% | 24.54% | -9.22% | 10.98% |
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 4.36% | 4.60% | 19.65% | 13.47% | -8.82% | 21.26% | 12.01% | 24.06% | -4.72% | 11.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQAL and USMF is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017 | 0.88 |
The correlation between EQAL and USMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EQAL vs. USMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQAL
USMF
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
EQAL
USMF
Industrials
EQAL
USMF
Financial Services
EQAL
USMF
Healthcare
EQAL
USMF
Energy
EQAL
USMF
Real Estate
EQAL
USMF
Consumer Defensive
EQAL
USMF
Basic Materials
EQAL
USMF
Utilities
EQAL
USMF
Consumer Cyclical
EQAL
USMF
Communication Services
EQAL
USMF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQAL vs. USMF — Risk / Return Rank
EQAL
USMF
EQAL vs. USMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQAL | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.10 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 0.98 | +2.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.89 | 2.93 | +9.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQAL | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 0.58 | +1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.54 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.63 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
EQAL vs. USMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQAL drawdown since its inception was -40.44%, which is greater than USMF's maximum drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQAL and USMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQAL | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.44% | -36.24% | -4.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.67% | -6.47% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.62% | -15.39% | -4.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.79% | -18.10% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -0.56% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -4.16% | -0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 2.15% | -0.26% |
Volatility
EQAL vs. USMF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) at 2.30%. This indicates that EQAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQAL | USMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 2.30% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.61% | 7.43% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.30% | 10.79% | +1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 14.27% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 16.97% | +1.91% |
EQAL vs. USMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQAL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than USMF's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQAL vs. USMF - Dividend Comparison
EQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than USMF's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQAL Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF | 1.64% | 1.79% | 1.62% | 1.88% | 1.95% | 1.32% | 1.63% | 1.61% | 1.62% | 1.18% | 1.57% | 1.64% |
USMF WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund | 1.32% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.74% | 1.42% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQAL and USMF have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQAL has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to USMF (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQAL dropped -40.44% vs USMF's -36.24%.
On 5-year performance, USMF leads with 7.67% vs 6.86% for EQAL. On fees, EQAL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, USMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USMF has performed better with a 7.67% return vs 6.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQAL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for USMF.
EQAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.32% for USMF.
EQAL tracks Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index, while USMF tracks WisdomTree US Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EQAL and 0.28% for USMF.
EQAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQAL and USMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer