EQAL vs. PEXL
EQAL (Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF) and PEXL (Pacer US Export Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - EQAL tracks the Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index while PEXL tracks the Pacer US Export Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EQAL returned 6.86%/yr vs 13.25%/yr for PEXL. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQAL charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PEXL.
Performance
EQAL vs. PEXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQAL achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly lower than PEXL's 23.12% return.
EQAL
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 12.35%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 24.33%
- 3Y*
- 15.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
PEXL
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 12.19%
- YTD
- 23.12%
- 6M
- 24.66%
- 1Y
- 53.95%
- 3Y*
- 22.51%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- —
EQAL vs. PEXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQAL Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF | 12.35% | 11.05% | 11.38% | 11.98% | -13.49% | 23.14% | 16.57% | 24.54% | -12.72% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 23.12% | 27.33% | 5.79% | 24.40% | -20.41% | 30.12% | 25.02% | 39.86% | -17.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQAL and PEXL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.85 |
The correlation between EQAL and PEXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
EQAL vs. PEXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EQAL
PEXL
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
EQAL
PEXL
Industrials
EQAL
PEXL
Financial Services
EQAL
PEXL
-
Healthcare
EQAL
PEXL
Energy
EQAL
PEXL
Real Estate
EQAL
PEXL
-
Consumer Defensive
EQAL
PEXL
Basic Materials
EQAL
PEXL
Utilities
EQAL
PEXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
EQAL
PEXL
Communication Services
EQAL
PEXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQAL vs. PEXL — Risk / Return Rank
EQAL
PEXL
EQAL vs. PEXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EQAL | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.51 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 4.74 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.89 | 20.42 | -7.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EQAL | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 3.05 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.61 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.65 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
EQAL vs. PEXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQAL drawdown since its inception was -40.44%, which is greater than PEXL's maximum drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQAL and PEXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQAL | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.44% | -36.76% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.67% | -11.43% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.62% | -24.72% | +5.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.79% | -30.44% | +8.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | 0.00% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -6.72% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 2.65% | -0.76% |
Volatility
EQAL vs. PEXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) is 3.05%, while Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that EQAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQAL | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 5.25% | -2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.61% | 13.10% | -4.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.30% | 17.80% | -5.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 21.86% | -4.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 24.04% | -5.16% |
EQAL vs. PEXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQAL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PEXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EQAL vs. PEXL - Dividend Comparison
EQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than PEXL's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQAL Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF | 1.64% | 1.79% | 1.62% | 1.88% | 1.95% | 1.32% | 1.63% | 1.61% | 1.62% | 1.18% | 1.57% | 1.64% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 0.34% | 0.44% | 0.48% | 0.48% | 0.60% | 0.22% | 0.48% | 0.49% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EQAL and PEXL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEXL has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to EQAL (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQAL dropped -40.44% vs PEXL's -36.76%.
On 5-year performance, PEXL leads with 13.25% vs 6.86% for EQAL. On fees, EQAL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EQAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PEXL has performed better with a 13.25% return vs 6.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQAL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEXL.
EQAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.34% for PEXL.
EQAL tracks Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index, while PEXL tracks Pacer US Export Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EQAL and 0.60% for PEXL.
PEXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQAL and PEXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer