EQAL vs. FSKAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EQAL (Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF) and FSKAX (Fidelity Total Market Index Fund) are both funds - EQAL is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index, while FSKAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, EQAL returned 10.66%/yr vs 15.09%/yr for FSKAX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQAL charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FSKAX.

Performance

EQAL vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EQAL having a 12.35% return and FSKAX slightly lower at 12.08%. Over the past 10 years, EQAL has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 10.66%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.09% annualized return.

EQAL

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 1.77%
• YTD: 12.35%
• 6M: 12.78%
• 1Y: 24.33%
• 3Y*: 15.37%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: 10.66%

FSKAX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 5.80%
• YTD: 12.08%
• 6M: 11.98%
• 1Y: 29.13%
• 3Y*: 22.42%
• 5Y*: 13.08%
• 10Y*: 15.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQAL vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EQAL Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF	12.35%	11.05%	11.38%	11.98%	-13.49%	23.14%	16.57%	24.54%	-9.22%	17.36%
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund	12.08%	17.06%	23.89%	26.12%	-19.53%	25.66%	20.79%	30.92%	-5.32%	20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between EQAL and FSKAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2014	0.88

The correlation between EQAL and FSKAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.89 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EQAL vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQAL

EQAL Risk / Return Rank: 63
EQAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
EQAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
EQAL Omega Ratio Rank: 56
EQAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
EQAL Martin Ratio Rank: 69

FSKAX

FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQAL vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQAL	FSKAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	2.46	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	3.35	-0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.44	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.66	3.38	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.89	15.52	-2.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQAL vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQAL and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQAL	FSKAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	2.46	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.76	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.82	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.85	-0.34

Drawdowns

EQAL vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQAL drawdown since its inception was -40.44%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQAL and FSKAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQAL	FSKAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.44%	-35.01%	-5.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.67%	-8.92%	+2.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.62%	-19.43%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.79%	-25.39%	+3.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.44%	-35.01%	-5.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	0.00%	-0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.10%	-4.02%	-1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	1.94%	-0.05%

Volatility

EQAL vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) have volatilities of 3.05% and 2.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQAL	FSKAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.05%	2.97%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.61%	9.23%	-0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.30%	12.26%	+0.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.28%	17.41%	-0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.88%	18.46%	+0.42%

EQAL vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQAL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EQAL vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

EQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than FSKAX's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQAL Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF	1.64%	1.79%	1.62%	1.88%	1.95%	1.32%	1.63%	1.61%	1.62%	1.18%	1.57%	1.64%
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund	0.93%	1.01%	1.19%	1.41%	1.62%	1.15%	1.45%	1.94%	2.54%	2.07%	2.43%	0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQAL and FSKAX in my portfolio?

EQAL and FSKAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EQAL or FSKAX?

EQAL has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to FSKAX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQAL dropped -40.44% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSKAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.