EPV vs. XTJL
EPV (ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EPV is passively managed, while XTJL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EPV returned -19.22%/yr vs 9.55%/yr for XTJL. Their -0.69 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EPV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.
Performance
EPV vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPV achieves a -18.89% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 6.32% return.
EPV
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- 6M
- -11.34%
- YTD
- -18.89%
- 1Y
- -34.32%
- 3Y*
- -24.89%
- 5Y*
- -19.22%
- 10Y*
- -22.79%
- ALL TIME*
- -25.50%
XTJL
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- 14.27%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $313.99K | $282.71K | $436.94K | |
| $26.11K | $26.81K | $267.40K |
EPV vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe | -18.89% | -45.21% | 2.02% | -30.81% | 15.53% | -9.03% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 6.32% | 15.42% | 14.43% | 25.72% | -15.66% | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPV and XTJL is -0.68, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | -0.69 |
The correlation between EPV and XTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.69 to -0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
EPV vs. XTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPV
XTJL
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EPV
XTJL
Basic Materials
EPV
-
XTJL
Communication Services
EPV
-
XTJL
Consumer Cyclical
EPV
-
XTJL
Consumer Defensive
EPV
-
XTJL
Energy
EPV
-
XTJL
Healthcare
EPV
-
XTJL
Industrials
EPV
-
XTJL
Real Estate
EPV
-
XTJL
Technology
EPV
-
XTJL
Utilities
EPV
-
XTJL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPV vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank
EPV
XTJL
EPV vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPV | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.36 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 2.55 | -3.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.55 | 14.07 | -15.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPV vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPV drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPV and XTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPV | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.41% | -23.24% | -76.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.01% | -5.12% | -29.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.48% | -16.70% | -50.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.41% | -23.24% | -57.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.40% | -0.09% | -99.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.47% | -3.92% | -84.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.81% | 0.93% | +20.88% |
Volatility
EPV vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 2.90%. This indicates that EPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPV | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.17% | 2.90% | +7.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.49% | 6.12% | +22.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.50% | 7.79% | +24.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.98% | 15.11% | +20.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.89% | 15.03% | +21.86% |
EPV vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPV vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison
EPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, while XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe | 4.93% | 4.80% | 4.83% | 3.17% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.09% | 1.10% | 0.19% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPV and XTJL have a correlation of -0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPV has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to XTJL (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPV dropped -99.41% vs XTJL's -23.24%.
On 5-year performance, XTJL leads with 9.55% vs -19.22% for EPV. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 9.55% return vs -19.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EPV.
EPV has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EPV and 0.79% for XTJL.
XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPV and XTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer