EPV vs. MUU

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

EPV (ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - EPV tracks the FTSE All Cap Developed Europe (-200%) while MUU tracks the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EPV returned -35.04% vs 2844.73% for MUU. Their -0.38 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EPV charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.

Performance

EPV vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPV achieves a -19.77% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 378.90% return.

EPV

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: -3.19%
• 6M: -10.92%
• YTD: -19.77%
• 1Y: -35.04%
• 3Y*: -26.13%
• 5Y*: -19.02%
• 10Y*: -22.82%
• ALL TIME*: -25.54%

MUU

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: -35.62%
• 6M: 114.51%
• YTD: 378.90%
• 1Y: 2,844.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 419.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe	$306.03K	$269.56K	$428.32K
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	$1.54B	$1.50B	$2.29B

EPV vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe	-19.77%	-45.21%	18.94%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	378.90%	599.03%	-40.91%

Correlation

The correlation between EPV and MUU is -0.38, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024	-0.38

Return for Risk

EPV vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EPV

EPV Risk / Return Rank: 1
EPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EPV Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
EPV Martin Ratio Rank: 0

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 98
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EPV vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPV	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.08	17.89	-18.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.55	4.98	-6.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.63	-0.80
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.05	42.38	-43.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.72	138.45	-140.18

EPV vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPV Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 17.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPV and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPV vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPV drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPV and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPV	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.41%	-75.07%	-24.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.55%	-68.07%	+34.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-93.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.41%	-60.98%	-38.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-88.47%	-24.42%	-64.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.92%	20.79%	+1.13%

Volatility

EPV vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) is 9.50%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 61.31%. This indicates that EPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPV	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.50%	61.31%	-51.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.44%	133.76%	-105.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.47%	161.53%	-129.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.99%	146.55%	-110.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.90%	146.55%	-109.65%

EPV vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPV vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

EPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than MUU's 1.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe	4.98%	4.80%	4.83%	3.17%	0.33%	0.01%	0.09%	1.10%	0.19%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	1.42%	4.27%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPV and MUU in my portfolio?

EPV and MUU have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPV or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (61.31%) compared to EPV (9.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPV dropped -99.41% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which ETF is better, EPV or MUU?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 2844.73% vs -35.04% for EPV. On fees, EPV is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, EPV has been the lower-risk option at 9.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPV or MUU?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 2844.73% return vs -35.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPV or MUU?

EPV is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPV or MUU?

EPV has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 1.42% for MUU.

What is the main difference between EPV and MUU?

EPV tracks FTSE All Cap Developed Europe (-200%), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EPV and 1.01% for MUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.89 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.