PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPU vs. SIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPU vs. SIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPU achieves a 22.98% return, which is significantly higher than SIL's 4.11% return. Over the past 10 years, EPU has outperformed SIL with an annualized return of 15.10%, while SIL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.15% annualized return.


EPU

1D
1.62%
1M
11.20%
YTD
22.98%
6M
29.01%
1Y
88.50%
3Y*
46.17%
5Y*
30.02%
10Y*
15.10%

SIL

1D
6.45%
1M
-5.08%
YTD
4.11%
6M
6.87%
1Y
80.36%
3Y*
49.62%
5Y*
14.79%
10Y*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPU vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
22.98%86.87%21.73%25.34%2.05%-11.81%-4.31%7.30%-12.17%29.70%
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
4.11%166.16%14.62%1.31%-22.83%-18.35%40.30%34.78%-22.42%1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between EPU and SIL is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010

0.59

The correlation between EPU and SIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EPU vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPU
SIL

Basic Materials

54.2%
99.8%

Financial Services

27.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
0.2%

Real Estate

3.0%

-

Utilities

2.8%

-

Industrials

2.6%

-

Communication Services

1.5%

-

Healthcare

0.9%

-

Energy

-

-

Technology

-

-

Basic Materials

EPU
54.2%
SIL
99.8%

Financial Services

EPU
27.9%
SIL

-

Consumer Cyclical

EPU
4.1%
SIL

-

Consumer Defensive

EPU
3.0%
SIL
0.2%

Real Estate

EPU
3.0%
SIL

-

Utilities

EPU
2.8%
SIL

-

Industrials

EPU
2.6%
SIL

-

Communication Services

EPU
1.5%
SIL

-

Healthcare

EPU
0.9%
SIL

-

Energy

EPU

-

SIL

-

Technology

EPU

-

SIL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPU vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPU
EPU Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPU Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPU Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SIL
SIL Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPU vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EPUSILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.27

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

2.18

+2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.29

5.76

+6.53

EPU vs. SIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPU Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is higher than the SIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPU and SIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EPU vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPU drawdown since its inception was -60.62%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPU and SIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPUSILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.62%

-82.99%

+22.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.85%

-37.08%

+16.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.85%

-37.08%

+16.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.59%

-50.47%

+14.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.97%

-63.04%

+12.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.18%

-26.33%

+21.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.81%

-51.40%

+32.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.22%

14.00%

-6.78%

Volatility

EPU vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) is 13.56%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 20.44%. This indicates that EPU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPUSILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.56%

20.44%

-6.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.92%

43.80%

-16.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.12%

52.15%

-21.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.09%

39.75%

-14.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.64%

39.84%

-16.20%

EPU vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPU has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPU vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison

EPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than SIL's 1.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
2.97%1.63%5.78%4.17%5.56%3.13%1.91%2.67%1.53%3.30%0.85%1.90%
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
1.14%1.18%2.40%0.59%0.48%1.59%1.92%1.53%1.21%0.02%3.34%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPU and SIL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIL has higher volatility (20.44%) compared to EPU (13.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPU dropped -60.62% vs SIL's -82.99%.

On 10-year performance, EPU leads with 15.10% vs 10.15% for SIL. On fees, EPU is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EPU has been the lower-risk option at 13.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EPU has performed better with a 15.10% return vs 10.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EPU is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.

EPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 1.14% for SIL.

EPU is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SIL is Silver. EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EPU and 0.65% for SIL.

EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPU and SIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer