EPU vs. SIL
EPU (iShares MSCI Peru ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPU is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Peru Capped Index, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPU returned 15.10%/yr vs 10.15%/yr for SIL. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPU charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.
Performance
EPU vs. SIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPU achieves a 22.98% return, which is significantly higher than SIL's 4.11% return. Over the past 10 years, EPU has outperformed SIL with an annualized return of 15.10%, while SIL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.15% annualized return.
EPU
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 11.20%
- YTD
- 22.98%
- 6M
- 29.01%
- 1Y
- 88.50%
- 3Y*
- 46.17%
- 5Y*
- 30.02%
- 10Y*
- 15.10%
SIL
- 1D
- 6.45%
- 1M
- -5.08%
- YTD
- 4.11%
- 6M
- 6.87%
- 1Y
- 80.36%
- 3Y*
- 49.62%
- 5Y*
- 14.79%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
EPU vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 22.98% | 86.87% | 21.73% | 25.34% | 2.05% | -11.81% | -4.31% | 7.30% | -12.17% | 29.70% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 4.11% | 166.16% | 14.62% | 1.31% | -22.83% | -18.35% | 40.30% | 34.78% | -22.42% | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPU and SIL is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010 | 0.59 |
The correlation between EPU and SIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EPU vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPU
SIL
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
-
Technology
-
-
Basic Materials
EPU
SIL
Financial Services
EPU
SIL
-
Consumer Cyclical
EPU
SIL
-
Consumer Defensive
EPU
SIL
Real Estate
EPU
SIL
-
Utilities
EPU
SIL
-
Industrials
EPU
SIL
-
Communication Services
EPU
SIL
-
Healthcare
EPU
SIL
-
Energy
EPU
-
SIL
-
Technology
EPU
-
SIL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPU vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank
EPU
SIL
EPU vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPU | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.27 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.27 | 2.18 | +2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.29 | 5.76 | +6.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPU vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPU drawdown since its inception was -60.62%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPU and SIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPU | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.62% | -82.99% | +22.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.85% | -37.08% | +16.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.85% | -37.08% | +16.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.59% | -50.47% | +14.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.97% | -63.04% | +12.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.18% | -26.33% | +21.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.81% | -51.40% | +32.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.22% | 14.00% | -6.78% |
Volatility
EPU vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) is 13.56%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 20.44%. This indicates that EPU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPU | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.56% | 20.44% | -6.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.92% | 43.80% | -16.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.12% | 52.15% | -21.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.09% | 39.75% | -14.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.64% | 39.84% | -16.20% |
EPU vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPU has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPU vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison
EPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than SIL's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 2.97% | 1.63% | 5.78% | 4.17% | 5.56% | 3.13% | 1.91% | 2.67% | 1.53% | 3.30% | 0.85% | 1.90% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.14% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPU and SIL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIL has higher volatility (20.44%) compared to EPU (13.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPU dropped -60.62% vs SIL's -82.99%.
On 10-year performance, EPU leads with 15.10% vs 10.15% for SIL. On fees, EPU is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EPU has been the lower-risk option at 13.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EPU has performed better with a 15.10% return vs 10.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EPU is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.
EPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 1.14% for SIL.
EPU is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SIL is Silver. EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EPU and 0.65% for SIL.
EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPU and SIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer