EPU vs. GREK
EPU (iShares MSCI Peru ETF) and GREK (Global X MSCI Greece ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPU is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Peru Capped Index, while GREK is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Greece Select 25-50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPU returned 13.58%/yr vs 16.17%/yr for GREK. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPU charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for GREK.
Performance
EPU vs. GREK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPU achieves a 18.75% return, which is significantly higher than GREK's 14.15% return. Over the past 10 years, EPU has underperformed GREK with an annualized return of 13.58%, while GREK has yielded a comparatively higher 16.17% annualized return.
EPU
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -3.76%
- 6M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 18.75%
- 1Y
- 78.54%
- 3Y*
- 42.43%
- 5Y*
- 29.59%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.56%
GREK
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- 6M
- 7.43%
- YTD
- 14.15%
- 1Y
- 25.52%
- 3Y*
- 27.97%
- 5Y*
- 27.03%
- 10Y*
- 16.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.76%
EPU vs. GREK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 18.75% | 86.87% | 21.73% | 25.34% | 2.05% | -11.81% | -4.31% | 7.30% | -12.17% | 29.70% |
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 14.15% | 76.11% | 9.53% | 42.72% | 3.64% | 6.14% | -13.89% | 50.20% | -31.25% | 34.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPU and GREK is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2011 | 0.36 |
The correlation between EPU and GREK shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EPU vs. GREK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPU
GREK
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Industrials
Utilities
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Technology
-
-
Basic Materials
EPU
GREK
Financial Services
EPU
GREK
Consumer Cyclical
EPU
GREK
Consumer Defensive
EPU
GREK
Real Estate
EPU
GREK
Industrials
EPU
GREK
Utilities
EPU
GREK
Communication Services
EPU
GREK
Healthcare
EPU
GREK
-
Energy
EPU
-
GREK
Technology
EPU
-
GREK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPU vs. GREK — Risk / Return Rank
EPU
GREK
EPU vs. GREK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) and Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPU | GREK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.20 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 1.20 | +2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.35 | 3.69 | +6.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPU vs. GREK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPU drawdown since its inception was -60.62%, smaller than the maximum GREK drawdown of -79.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPU and GREK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPU | GREK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.62% | -79.50% | +18.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.85% | -21.32% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.85% | -22.63% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.59% | -30.46% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.97% | -57.04% | +6.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.45% | -4.93% | -3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.75% | -44.97% | +26.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.61% | 6.93% | +0.68% |
Volatility
EPU vs. GREK - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) at 5.98%. This indicates that EPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GREK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPU | GREK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | 5.98% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.14% | 21.10% | +6.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.72% | 24.36% | +7.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.21% | 24.39% | +0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 28.85% | -5.19% |
EPU vs. GREK - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPU has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GREK's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPU vs. GREK - Dividend Comparison
EPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than GREK's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 2.02% | 1.63% | 5.78% | 4.17% | 5.56% | 3.13% | 1.91% | 2.67% | 1.53% | 3.30% | 0.85% | 1.90% |
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 2.61% | 3.46% | 4.63% | 2.61% | 2.82% | 2.16% | 2.62% | 2.25% | 2.41% | 2.13% | 1.95% | 1.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPU and GREK have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPU has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to GREK (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPU dropped -60.62% vs GREK's -79.50%.
On 10-year performance, GREK leads with 16.17% vs 13.58% for EPU. On fees, GREK is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, GREK has been the lower-risk option at 5.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GREK has performed better with a 16.17% return vs 13.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GREK is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EPU.
GREK has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 2.02% for EPU.
EPU is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while GREK is Emerging Markets Equities. EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index, while GREK tracks MSCI All Greece Select 25-50. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EPU and 0.58% for GREK.
EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPU and GREK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer