PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EPU vs. FLLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EPU vs. FLLA

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

EPU (iShares MSCI Peru ETF) and FLLA (Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF) are both Latin America Equities funds - EPU tracks the MSCI All Peru Capped Index while FLLA tracks the FTSE Latin America RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EPU returned 31.75%/yr vs 9.94%/yr for FLLA. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EPU charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLLA.

Performance

EPU vs. FLLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) and Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPU achieves a 20.80% return, which is significantly higher than FLLA's 16.42% return.

EPU

1D
-0.99%
1M
2.20%
6M
0.92%
YTD
20.80%
1Y
81.51%
3Y*
42.19%
5Y*
31.75%
10Y*
13.22%
ALL TIME*
10.65%

FLLA

1D
0.04%
1M
4.57%
6M
1.61%
YTD
16.42%
1Y
41.47%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
6.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

EPU

iShares MSCI Peru ETF
$5.01M$4.02M$5.98M

FLLA

Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF
$649.19K$662.69K$1.07M

EPU vs. FLLA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF		20.80%86.87%21.73%25.34%2.05%-11.81%-4.31%7.30%-1.14%
FLLA
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF		16.42%51.81%-26.89%32.71%7.78%-8.93%-15.08%19.59%-2.78%

Correlation

The correlation between EPU and FLLA is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2018

0.56

The correlation between EPU and FLLA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPU vs. FLLA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EPU
FLLA

Basic Materials

49.5%
18.1%

Financial Services

31.6%
27.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
11.2%

Real Estate

3.0%
3.0%

Industrials

2.9%
9.6%

Utilities

2.9%
9.8%

Communication Services

1.4%
3.9%

Healthcare

1.0%
0.8%

Energy

-

11.3%

Technology

-

0.4%

Basic Materials

EPU
49.5%
FLLA
18.1%

Financial Services

EPU
31.6%
FLLA
27.1%

Consumer Cyclical

EPU
4.5%
FLLA
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

EPU
3.3%
FLLA
11.2%

Real Estate

EPU
3.0%
FLLA
3.0%

Industrials

EPU
2.9%
FLLA
9.6%

Utilities

EPU
2.9%
FLLA
9.8%

Communication Services

EPU
1.4%
FLLA
3.9%

Healthcare

EPU
1.0%
FLLA
0.8%

Energy

EPU

-

FLLA
11.3%

Technology

EPU

-

FLLA
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Peru ETF

Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF

Often compared with EPU:
EPU vs. ECHEPU vs. ILFEPU vs. ARGTEPU vs. EISEPU vs. EVXEPU vs. EPIEPU vs. EWS
Often compared with FLLA:
FLLA vs. ILFFLLA vs. FLBRFLLA vs. ASEAFLLA vs. USDUFLLA vs. FTGCFLLA vs. EMCRFLLA vs. FLN

Return for Risk

EPU vs. FLLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
EPU
EPU Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
EPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPU Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPU Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
FLLA
FLLA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FLLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLLA Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FLLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLLA Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EPU vs. FLLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) and Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EPUFLLADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.52
1.94

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.96
2.56

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.33

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

3.04

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.45

7.38

+3.08

EPU vs. FLLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPU Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the FLLA Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPU and FLLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EPU vs. FLLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPU drawdown since its inception was -60.62%, which is greater than FLLA's maximum drawdown of -53.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPU and FLLA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EPUFLLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.62%

-53.88%

-6.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.85%

-13.75%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.85%

-27.76%

+6.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.59%

-28.32%

-7.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.97%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.86%

-7.96%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.72%

-13.42%

-5.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.72%

5.66%

+2.06%

Volatility

EPU vs. FLLA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) at 4.91%. This indicates that EPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EPUFLLADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.00%

4.91%

+4.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.47%

17.61%

+9.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.03%

21.63%

+10.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.09%

22.66%

+2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.71%

27.36%

-3.65%

EPU vs. FLLA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPU has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FLLA's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPU vs. FLLA - Dividend Comparison

EPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than FLLA's 4.71% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF		1.98%1.63%5.78%4.17%5.56%3.13%1.91%2.67%1.53%3.30%0.85%1.90%
FLLA
Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF		4.71%6.06%7.04%5.45%9.55%7.60%2.12%3.18%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

EPU and FLLA have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPU has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to FLLA (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPU dropped -60.62% vs FLLA's -53.88%.

On 5-year performance, EPU leads with 31.75% vs 9.94% for FLLA. On fees, FLLA is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLLA has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EPU has performed better with a 31.75% return vs 9.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLLA is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EPU.

FLLA has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 1.98% for EPU.

EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index, while FLLA tracks FTSE Latin America RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EPU and 0.19% for FLLA.

EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPU and FLLA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer