EPU vs. DRNZ
EPU (iShares MSCI Peru ETF) and DRNZ (REX Drone ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPU is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Peru Capped Index, while DRNZ is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the VettaFi Drone Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPU charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRNZ.
Performance
EPU vs. DRNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPU achieves a 8.58% return, which is significantly lower than DRNZ's 16.66% return.
EPU
- 1D
- -6.28%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- 8.58%
- 6M
- 17.68%
- 1Y
- 64.72%
- 3Y*
- 41.90%
- 5Y*
- 22.72%
- 10Y*
- 13.41%
DRNZ
- 1D
- -8.60%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- YTD
- 16.66%
- 6M
- 21.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EPU vs. DRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 8.58% | 15.10% |
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | 16.66% | -10.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPU and DRNZ is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPU vs. DRNZ — Risk / Return Rank
EPU
DRNZ
EPU vs. DRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) and REX Drone ETF (DRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPU | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPU | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.13 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
EPU vs. DRNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPU drawdown since its inception was -60.62%, which is greater than DRNZ's maximum drawdown of -24.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPU and DRNZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPU | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.62% | -24.52% | -36.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.28% | -13.46% | -2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.82% | -11.10% | -7.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.02% | — | — |
Volatility
EPU vs. DRNZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPU | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.03% | 51.81% | -21.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.20% | 51.81% | -26.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.51% | 51.81% | -28.30% |
EPU vs. DRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPU has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DRNZ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPU vs. DRNZ - Dividend Comparison
EPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, while DRNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EPU iShares MSCI Peru ETF | 1.50% | 1.63% | 5.78% | 4.17% | 5.56% | 3.13% | 1.91% | 2.67% | 1.53% | 3.30% | 0.85% | 1.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPU and DRNZ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EPU is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EPU is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRNZ.
EPU has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.00% for DRNZ.
EPU is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while DRNZ is Aerospace & Defense. EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index, while DRNZ tracks VettaFi Drone Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EPU and 0.65% for DRNZ.
Find the right allocation for EPU and DRNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer