EPSV vs. ECML

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EPSV (Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF) and ECML (EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EPSV returned 46.19% vs 26.84% for ECML. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EPSV charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ECML.

Performance

EPSV vs. ECML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) and EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPSV achieves a 26.42% return, which is significantly higher than ECML's 14.39% return.

EPSV

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 7.26%
• YTD: 26.42%
• 6M: 26.98%
• 1Y: 46.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ECML

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 1.49%
• YTD: 14.39%
• 6M: 14.23%
• 1Y: 26.84%
• 3Y*: 15.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPSV vs. ECML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EPSV Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF	26.42%	20.91%
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF	14.39%	13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between EPSV and ECML is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025	0.85

The correlation between EPSV and ECML has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPSV vs. ECML - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EPSV	ECML
Industrials	24.9%	14.2%
Technology	22.7%	5.3%
Financial Services	19.1%	-
Real Estate	7.5%	-
Energy	6.1%	13.2%
Consumer Cyclical	5.8%	23.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	12.4%
Basic Materials	4.3%	10.6%
Utilities	3.7%	1.4%
Healthcare	0.9%	16.6%
Communication Services	-	3.9%

Return for Risk

EPSV vs. ECML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPSV

EPSV Risk / Return Rank: 83
EPSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
EPSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
EPSV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EPSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
EPSV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

ECML

ECML Risk / Return Rank: 61
ECML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ECML Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
ECML Omega Ratio Rank: 53
ECML Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
ECML Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPSV vs. ECML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) and EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EPSV	ECML	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.62	1.86	+0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	2.85	+0.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.32	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.19	3.85	+1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.03	11.05	+6.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EPSV vs. ECML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPSV Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is higher than the ECML Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPSV and ECML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EPSV	ECML	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.62	1.86	+0.77
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.66	0.86	+1.80

Drawdowns

EPSV vs. ECML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPSV drawdown since its inception was -8.93%, smaller than the maximum ECML drawdown of -24.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPSV and ECML.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPSV	ECML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.93%	-24.66%	+15.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	-7.01%	-1.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-0.27%	+0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.67%	-5.88%	+4.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	2.44%	+0.13%

Volatility

EPSV vs. ECML - Volatility Comparison

Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) at 3.84%. This indicates that EPSV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPSV	ECML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.05%	3.84%	+2.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.80%	9.75%	+3.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.75%	14.56%	+3.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.14%	18.39%	-0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.14%	18.39%	-0.25%

EPSV vs. ECML - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPSV has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than ECML's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPSV vs. ECML - Dividend Comparison

EPSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than ECML's 1.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ECML EA Series Trust - Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF	1.20%	1.38%	0.98%	0.77%
EPSV Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF	2.28%	2.88%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPSV and ECML in my portfolio?

EPSV and ECML have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPSV or ECML?

EPSV has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to ECML (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPSV dropped -8.93% vs ECML's -24.66%.

Which ETF is better, EPSV or ECML?

On 1-year performance, EPSV leads with 46.19% vs 26.84% for ECML. On fees, EPSV is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, ECML has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPSV or ECML?

Over the 1-year period, EPSV has performed better with a 46.19% return vs 26.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPSV or ECML?

EPSV is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ECML.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPSV or ECML?

EPSV has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.20% for ECML.

What is the main difference between EPSV and ECML?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Euclidean. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPSV and 0.95% for ECML.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.