EPSB vs. VB
EPSB (Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. EPSB is actively managed, while VB is passively managed. Over the past year, EPSB returned 29.37% vs 28.82% for VB. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EPSB charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.
Performance
EPSB vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPSB achieves a 18.61% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 14.16% return.
EPSB
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 18.61%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 29.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VB
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 14.16%
- 6M
- 14.12%
- 1Y
- 28.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
EPSB vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EPSB Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF | 18.61% | 13.67% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 14.16% | 17.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPSB and VB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025 | 0.91 |
The correlation between EPSB and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
EPSB vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPSB
VB
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
EPSB
VB
Technology
EPSB
VB
Financial Services
EPSB
VB
Consumer Cyclical
EPSB
VB
Basic Materials
EPSB
VB
Healthcare
EPSB
VB
Real Estate
EPSB
VB
Energy
EPSB
VB
Utilities
EPSB
VB
Communication Services
EPSB
-
VB
Consumer Defensive
EPSB
-
VB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPSB vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
EPSB
VB
EPSB vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPSB | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.31 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 3.22 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.84 | 11.87 | -0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPSB | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.78 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.08 | 0.44 | +1.64 |
Drawdowns
EPSB vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPSB drawdown since its inception was -8.46%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPSB and VB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPSB | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.46% | -59.56% | +51.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.46% | -8.98% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -0.65% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -8.44% | +6.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 2.43% | +0.06% |
Volatility
EPSB vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) have volatilities of 4.44% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPSB | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 4.42% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.87% | 11.72% | -0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.00% | 16.28% | -1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 20.74% | -5.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 21.42% | -6.04% |
EPSB vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPSB has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPSB vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
EPSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than VB's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPSB Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF | 1.15% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.19% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, EPSB and VB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EPSB has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to VB (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPSB dropped -8.46% vs VB's -59.56%.
On 1-year performance, EPSB leads with 29.37% vs 28.82% for VB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EPSB has performed better with a 29.37% return vs 28.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPSB.
VB has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 1.15% for EPSB.
They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPSB and 0.05% for VB.
EPSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPSB and VB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer