EPSB vs. TNA
EPSB (Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF) and TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - EPSB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while TNA is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). EPSB is actively managed, while TNA is passively managed. Over the past year, EPSB returned 31.95% vs 134.58% for TNA. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EPSB charges 0.88%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TNA.
Performance
EPSB vs. TNA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPSB achieves a 21.08% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 57.67% return.
EPSB
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 21.08%
- 6M
- 20.24%
- 1Y
- 31.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TNA
- 1D
- 5.81%
- 1M
- 13.02%
- YTD
- 57.67%
- 6M
- 48.66%
- 1Y
- 134.58%
- 3Y*
- 28.48%
- 5Y*
- -3.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.86%
EPSB vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EPSB Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF | 21.08% | 14.56% |
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 57.67% | 76.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPSB and TNA is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2025 | 0.87 |
The correlation between EPSB and TNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
EPSB vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPSB
TNA
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
EPSB
TNA
Technology
EPSB
TNA
Financial Services
EPSB
TNA
Consumer Cyclical
EPSB
TNA
Healthcare
EPSB
TNA
Basic Materials
EPSB
TNA
Real Estate
EPSB
TNA
Utilities
EPSB
TNA
Energy
EPSB
TNA
Communication Services
EPSB
-
TNA
Consumer Defensive
EPSB
-
TNA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPSB vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank
EPSB
TNA
EPSB vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPSB | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.32 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 4.11 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.89 | 13.50 | -0.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPSB vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPSB drawdown since its inception was -8.46%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPSB and TNA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPSB | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.46% | -88.09% | +79.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.46% | -32.53% | +24.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -65.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -82.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -88.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -33.32% | +32.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.54% | -33.92% | +32.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 9.89% | -7.40% |
Volatility
EPSB vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB) is 4.96%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 20.47%. This indicates that EPSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPSB | TNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 20.47% | -15.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.33% | 42.66% | -31.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.31% | 58.63% | -43.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 67.58% | -52.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 68.58% | -53.04% |
EPSB vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPSB has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPSB vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison
EPSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than TNA's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPSB Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF | 1.13% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 0.38% | 0.78% | 0.93% | 1.27% | 0.31% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.44% | 0.36% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPSB and TNA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TNA has higher volatility (20.47%) compared to EPSB (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPSB dropped -8.46% vs TNA's -88.09%.
On 1-year performance, TNA leads with 134.58% vs 31.95% for EPSB. On fees, EPSB is cheaper at 0.88% per year. On volatility, EPSB has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TNA has performed better with a 134.58% return vs 31.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EPSB is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.
EPSB has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.38% for TNA.
EPSB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while TNA is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPSB and 1.05% for TNA.
TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPSB and TNA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer