PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPS vs. JQUA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPS vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPS achieves a 12.21% return, which is significantly lower than JQUA's 14.16% return.


EPS

1D
0.71%
1M
4.83%
YTD
12.21%
6M
12.21%
1Y
30.17%
3Y*
22.45%
5Y*
13.22%
10Y*
14.93%

JQUA

1D
-0.11%
1M
7.20%
YTD
14.16%
6M
14.37%
1Y
22.69%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
13.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPS vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPS
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund
12.21%17.40%23.97%22.81%-15.82%27.47%12.02%32.54%-7.52%4.68%
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
14.16%11.69%21.21%25.13%-13.45%28.68%16.56%28.47%-2.98%5.07%

Correlation

The correlation between EPS and JQUA is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.89

The correlation between EPS and JQUA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPS vs. JQUA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPS
JQUA

Technology

32.5%
41.9%

Financial Services

15.4%
10.2%

Communication Services

13.4%
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
9.2%

Healthcare

9.5%
7.2%

Industrials

5.4%
7.6%

Energy

4.4%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
5.3%

Utilities

2.1%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.3%
0.8%

Real Estate

0.9%
2.1%

Technology

EPS
32.5%
JQUA
41.9%

Financial Services

EPS
15.4%
JQUA
10.2%

Communication Services

EPS
13.4%
JQUA
5.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EPS
10.9%
JQUA
9.2%

Healthcare

EPS
9.5%
JQUA
7.2%

Industrials

EPS
5.4%
JQUA
7.6%

Energy

EPS
4.4%
JQUA
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

EPS
4.3%
JQUA
5.3%

Utilities

EPS
2.1%
JQUA
2.3%

Basic Materials

EPS
1.3%
JQUA
0.8%

Real Estate

EPS
0.9%
JQUA
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPS vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPS
EPS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

JQUA
JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPS vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPSJQUADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.35

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

3.20

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.87

13.48

+3.39

EPS vs. JQUA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPS Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the JQUA Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPS and JQUA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPSJQUADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.03

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.90

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.83

-0.27

Drawdowns

EPS vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPS drawdown since its inception was -54.43%, which is greater than JQUA's maximum drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPS and JQUA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPSJQUADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.43%

-32.92%

-21.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.39%

-7.13%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.65%

-16.81%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

-22.47%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.28%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-4.16%

-3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

1.69%

+0.10%

Volatility

EPS vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) have volatilities of 2.78% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPSJQUADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.82%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.79%

8.31%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.35%

11.20%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

15.61%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.65%

17.99%

-0.34%

EPS vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EPS vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison

EPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than JQUA's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPS
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund
1.14%1.26%1.47%1.73%1.95%1.51%1.85%1.70%2.02%1.59%1.99%2.15%
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
1.07%1.19%1.24%1.21%1.60%1.32%1.44%1.67%2.10%0.40%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPS and JQUA have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JQUA has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to EPS (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPS dropped -54.43% vs JQUA's -32.92%.

On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 13.92% vs 13.22% for EPS. On fees, EPS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 13.92% return vs 13.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EPS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for JQUA.

EPS has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 1.07% for JQUA.

EPS tracks WisdomTree U.S. Large Cap Index, while JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for EPS and 0.12% for JQUA.

EPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPS and JQUA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer