PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPS vs. GDMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EPS vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EPS vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EPS
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund
-3.60%17.40%23.97%22.81%-15.82%1.52%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
8.77%237.09%28.23%12.97%-14.62%5.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPS achieves a -3.60% return, which is significantly lower than GDMN's 8.77% return.


EPS

1D
2.85%
1M
-4.30%
YTD
-3.60%
6M
-0.58%
1Y
16.43%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
11.09%
10Y*
13.32%

GDMN

1D
9.38%
1M
-27.72%
YTD
8.77%
6M
31.63%
1Y
140.14%
3Y*
65.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EPS vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EPS vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPS
EPS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

GDMN
GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPS vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPSGDMNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.95

2.20

-1.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

2.34

-0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.35

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

3.69

-2.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.81

12.63

-5.82

EPS vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPS Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPS and GDMN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPSGDMNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

2.20

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.94

-0.42

Correlation

The correlation between EPS and GDMN is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

EPS vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

EPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than GDMN's 2.48% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPS
WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund
1.32%1.26%1.47%1.73%1.95%1.51%1.85%1.70%2.02%1.59%1.99%2.15%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
2.48%2.70%9.44%7.69%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EPS vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPS drawdown since its inception was -54.43%, roughly equal to the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPS and GDMN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EPSGDMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.43%

-52.82%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.87%

-39.03%

+27.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.78%

-28.60%

+22.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.72%

-18.45%

+10.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

11.39%

-8.86%

Volatility

EPS vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Fund (EPS) is 5.22%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 24.97%. This indicates that EPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EPSGDMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

24.97%

-19.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

53.89%

-44.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.30%

63.99%

-46.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

47.19%

-31.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.65%

47.19%

-29.54%