EPRT vs. FLTW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EPRT (Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.) is a stock, while FLTW (Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF) is Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. Over the past 5 years, EPRT returned 6.51%/yr vs 21.46%/yr for FLTW. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EPRT vs. FLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPRT achieves a 3.37% return, which is significantly lower than FLTW's 69.07% return.

EPRT

• 1D: 3.02%
• 1M: -3.13%
• YTD: 3.37%
• 6M: 5.12%
• 1Y: -4.12%
• 3Y*: 14.49%
• 5Y*: 6.51%
• 10Y*: —

FLTW

• 1D: -5.93%
• 1M: 8.95%
• YTD: 69.07%
• 6M: 72.09%
• 1Y: 109.94%
• 3Y*: 41.99%
• 5Y*: 21.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPRT vs. FLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EPRT Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.	3.37%	-1.40%	27.32%	14.20%	-14.60%	41.19%	-9.72%	86.75%	4.25%
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF	69.07%	32.00%	16.68%	30.05%	-27.51%	29.46%	29.77%	31.23%	-7.72%

Correlation

The correlation between EPRT and FLTW is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2018	0.23

The correlation between EPRT and FLTW shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EPRT vs. FLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPRT

EPRT Risk / Return Rank: 31
EPRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
EPRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
EPRT Omega Ratio Rank: 28
EPRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
EPRT Martin Ratio Rank: 32

FLTW

FLTW Risk / Return Rank: 94
FLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPRT vs. FLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPRT	FLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	3.80	-4.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.20	4.09	-4.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.60	-0.63
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.29	10.17	-10.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.63	30.39	-31.02

EPRT vs. FLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPRT Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the FLTW Sharpe Ratio of 3.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPRT and FLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPRT vs. FLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPRT drawdown since its inception was -73.67%, which is greater than FLTW's maximum drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRT and FLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPRT	FLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.67%	-38.00%	-35.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.26%	-10.87%	-3.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.31%	-26.45%	+6.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.42%	-38.00%	-0.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.36%	-5.93%	-5.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.92%	-8.41%	-5.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.92%	3.63%	+3.29%

Volatility

EPRT vs. FLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) is 6.90%, while Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) has a volatility of 16.14%. This indicates that EPRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPRT	FLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.90%	16.14%	-9.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.72%	25.07%	-11.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.30%	29.07%	-10.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.67%	23.23%	-0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.48%	22.20%	+16.28%

Dividends

EPRT vs. FLTW - Dividend Comparison

EPRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than FLTW's 1.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EPRT Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.	4.02%	4.06%	3.71%	4.38%	4.58%	3.47%	4.39%	3.55%	1.62%
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF	1.42%	2.51%	1.89%	2.85%	3.16%	2.31%	2.14%	3.00%	1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPRT and FLTW in my portfolio?

EPRT and FLTW have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPRT or FLTW?

FLTW has higher volatility (16.14%) compared to EPRT (6.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPRT dropped -73.67% vs FLTW's -38.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.