EPRA.L vs. GLRE.L
EPRA.L (Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR) and GLRE.L (SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, from Amundi and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EPRA.L returned 2.03%/yr vs 2.44%/yr for GLRE.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EPRA.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLRE.L.
Performance
EPRA.L vs. GLRE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EPRA.L is traded in GBp, while GLRE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLRE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EPRA.L having a 6.79% return and GLRE.L slightly higher at 7.04%.
EPRA.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 6.50%
- 1Y
- 12.77%
- 3Y*
- 6.12%
- 5Y*
- 2.03%
- 10Y*
- —
GLRE.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 7.04%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 13.15%
- 3Y*
- 6.06%
- 5Y*
- 2.44%
- 10Y*
- 3.90%
EPRA.L vs. GLRE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRA.L Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR | 6.79% | 3.12% | 1.31% | 4.40% | -16.02% | 27.84% | -11.99% | 17.30% | -0.56% | 0.64% |
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 7.04% | 2.13% | 1.21% | 5.68% | -16.37% | 31.85% | -13.50% | 15.95% | -0.79% | 1.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPRA.L and GLRE.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017 | 0.90 |
The correlation between EPRA.L and GLRE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EPRA.L vs. GLRE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPRA.L
GLRE.L
Real Estate
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
EPRA.L
GLRE.L
Technology
EPRA.L
GLRE.L
-
Financial Services
EPRA.L
GLRE.L
Industrials
EPRA.L
GLRE.L
Consumer Cyclical
EPRA.L
GLRE.L
-
Communication Services
EPRA.L
GLRE.L
-
Healthcare
EPRA.L
GLRE.L
-
Basic Materials
EPRA.L
GLRE.L
-
Consumer Defensive
EPRA.L
GLRE.L
-
Energy
EPRA.L
GLRE.L
-
Utilities
EPRA.L
GLRE.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPRA.L vs. GLRE.L — Risk / Return Rank
EPRA.L
GLRE.L
EPRA.L vs. GLRE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L) and SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPRA.L | GLRE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.19 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 1.68 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.00 | 5.37 | -0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPRA.L | GLRE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.06 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.16 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.35 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
EPRA.L vs. GLRE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPRA.L drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, roughly equal to the maximum GLRE.L drawdown of -36.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRA.L and GLRE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPRA.L | GLRE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.65% | -36.91% | +1.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.95% | -7.79% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.01% | -17.16% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.59% | -27.71% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.51% | -4.45% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -10.05% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 2.44% | +0.11% |
Volatility
EPRA.L vs. GLRE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L) is 3.19%, while SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (GLRE.L) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that EPRA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLRE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPRA.L | GLRE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 3.51% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 9.62% | -1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 12.38% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.74% | 15.68% | -1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 16.96% | -1.46% |
EPRA.L vs. GLRE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPRA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than GLRE.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPRA.L vs. GLRE.L - Dividend Comparison
EPRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRA.L Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLRE.L SPDR Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 2.58% | 2.72% | 2.79% | 2.62% | 2.85% | 1.82% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 3.54% | 3.86% | 2.66% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPRA.L and GLRE.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EPRA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EPRA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLRE.L.
Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EPRA.L and 0.40% for GLRE.L.
Find the right allocation for EPRA.L and GLRE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer