PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EPP vs. EWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EPP vs. EWM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

EPP (iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF) and EWM (iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from iShares - EPP tracks the MSCI Pacific ex-Japan Index while EWM tracks the MSCI Malaysia Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPP returned 7.34%/yr vs 2.61%/yr for EWM. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EPP charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWM.

Performance

EPP vs. EWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP) and iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPP achieves a 13.66% return, which is significantly higher than EWM's 4.76% return. Over the past 10 years, EPP has outperformed EWM with an annualized return of 7.34%, while EWM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.61% annualized return.

EPP

1D
-1.26%
1M
5.83%
6M
7.04%
YTD
13.66%
1Y
19.08%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
6.35%
10Y*
7.34%
ALL TIME*
9.07%

EWM

1D
-0.64%
1M
4.12%
6M
-1.77%
YTD
4.76%
1Y
21.43%
3Y*
13.17%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
2.61%
ALL TIME*
1.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

EPP

iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
$14.47M$15.53M$19.44M

EWM

iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF
$7.66M$6.48M$7.51M

EPP vs. EWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPP
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF		13.66%19.70%4.76%5.76%-6.59%4.26%6.04%18.30%-10.78%26.05%
EWM
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF		4.76%15.74%19.46%-3.61%-6.00%-7.40%3.12%-1.41%-6.28%24.25%

Correlation

The correlation between EPP and EWM is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2001

0.59

The correlation between EPP and EWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPP vs. EWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EPP
EWM

Financial Services

45.0%
51.8%

Basic Materials

15.8%
8.8%

Industrials

8.7%
9.9%

Real Estate

7.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
1.1%

Healthcare

3.8%
3.1%

Utilities

3.5%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
7.3%

Communication Services

2.6%
5.3%

Energy

2.5%
2.9%

Technology

1.0%

-

Financial Services

EPP
45.0%
EWM
51.8%

Basic Materials

EPP
15.8%
EWM
8.8%

Industrials

EPP
8.7%
EWM
9.9%

Real Estate

EPP
7.2%
EWM

-

Consumer Cyclical

EPP
6.9%
EWM
1.1%

Healthcare

EPP
3.8%
EWM
3.1%

Utilities

EPP
3.5%
EWM
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

EPP
3.2%
EWM
7.3%

Communication Services

EPP
2.6%
EWM
5.3%

Energy

EPP
2.5%
EWM
2.9%

Technology

EPP
1.0%
EWM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF

iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF

Often compared with EPP:
EPP vs. AAXJEPP vs. EWTEPP vs. BBAXEPP vs. EWHEPP vs. AIAEPP vs. EWYEPP vs. VPL
Often compared with EWM:
EWM vs. EIDOEWM vs. EWYEWM vs. EWTEWM vs. EPIEWM vs. VOOEWM vs. AAXJEWM vs. SCHD

Return for Risk

EPP vs. EWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
EPP
EPP Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
EPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPP Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPP Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
EWM
EWM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
EWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
EWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWM Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EPP vs. EWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP) and iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EPPEWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.23
1.69

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.77
2.38

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.29

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

2.27

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.94

6.02

-0.08

EPP vs. EWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the EWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPP and EWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EPP vs. EWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPP drawdown since its inception was -66.01%, smaller than the maximum EWM drawdown of -89.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPP and EWM.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EPPEWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.01%

-89.19%

+23.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.79%

-10.61%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.29%

-21.31%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.55%

-22.76%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.30%

-43.81%

+4.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-7.42%

+6.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.57%

-31.70%

+21.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

3.99%

-0.84%

Volatility

EPP vs. EWM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP) and iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) have volatilities of 3.89% and 3.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EPPEWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

3.73%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.79%

10.74%

+2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.30%

14.33%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.52%

13.79%

+3.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.01%

16.16%

+2.85%

EPP vs. EWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPP has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than EWM's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPP vs. EWM - Dividend Comparison

EPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than EWM's 3.55% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPP
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF		3.31%3.77%3.81%4.10%4.37%4.58%2.28%3.89%5.00%4.15%3.96%4.90%
EWM
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF		3.55%3.41%3.32%3.47%3.00%6.48%1.89%2.91%3.84%5.58%5.97%37.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

EPP and EWM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPP has higher volatility (3.89%) compared to EWM (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPP dropped -66.01% vs EWM's -89.19%.

On 10-year performance, EPP leads with 7.34% vs 2.61% for EWM. On fees, EPP is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, EWM has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EPP has performed better with a 7.34% return vs 2.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EPP is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWM.

EWM has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 3.31% for EPP.

EPP tracks MSCI Pacific ex-Japan Index, while EWM tracks MSCI Malaysia Index. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EPP and 0.49% for EWM.

EWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPP and EWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer