PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EPP vs. EEMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EPP vs. EEMA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EPP (iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF) and EEMA (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from iShares - EPP tracks the MSCI Pacific ex-Japan Index while EEMA tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPP returned 7.60%/yr vs 10.80%/yr for EEMA. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPP charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EEMA.

Performance

EPP vs. EEMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPP achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly lower than EEMA's 27.78% return. Over the past 10 years, EPP has underperformed EEMA with an annualized return of 7.60%, while EEMA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.80% annualized return.

EPP

1D
-1.07%
1M
1.12%
YTD
9.57%
6M
10.96%
1Y
17.40%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*
7.60%

EEMA

1D
-1.17%
1M
9.00%
YTD
27.78%
6M
30.96%
1Y
56.77%
3Y*
24.08%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPP vs. EEMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPP
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF		9.57%19.70%4.76%5.76%-6.59%4.26%6.04%18.30%-10.78%26.05%
EEMA
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF		27.78%33.27%10.23%6.57%-21.49%-4.22%25.17%18.60%-15.76%43.41%

Correlation

The correlation between EPP and EEMA is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2012

0.75

The correlation between EPP and EEMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPP vs. EEMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EPP
EEMA

Financial Services

46.0%
15.9%

Basic Materials

14.6%
4.5%

Industrials

8.6%
8.8%

Real Estate

7.8%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
11.3%

Healthcare

3.7%
3.7%

Utilities

3.6%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
2.8%

Energy

2.9%
3.2%

Communication Services

2.7%
6.0%

Technology

1.1%
41.2%

Financial Services

EPP
46.0%
EEMA
15.9%

Basic Materials

EPP
14.6%
EEMA
4.5%

Industrials

EPP
8.6%
EEMA
8.8%

Real Estate

EPP
7.8%
EEMA
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EPP
6.0%
EEMA
11.3%

Healthcare

EPP
3.7%
EEMA
3.7%

Utilities

EPP
3.6%
EEMA
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

EPP
3.0%
EEMA
2.8%

Energy

EPP
2.9%
EEMA
3.2%

Communication Services

EPP
2.7%
EEMA
6.0%

Technology

EPP
1.1%
EEMA
41.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF

Often compared with EPP:
EPP vs. EWTEPP vs. AAXJEPP vs. BBAXEPP vs. EWHEPP vs. AIAEPP vs. EWYEPP vs. VPL
Often compared with EEMA:
EEMA vs. AIAEEMA vs. GMFEEMA vs. VFEM.LEEMA vs. VAPX.ASEEMA vs. GXCEEMA vs. MATFXEEMA vs. MCHI

Return for Risk

EPP vs. EEMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EPP
EPP Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
EPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPP Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPP Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
EEMA
EEMA Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EEMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMA Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPP vs. EEMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EPPEEMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.20
2.80

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.74
3.64

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.50

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

3.99

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.27

15.03

-8.76

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EPP vs. EEMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the EEMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPP and EEMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EPPEEMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

2.80

-1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.35

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.52

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.37

+0.02

Drawdowns

EPP vs. EEMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPP drawdown since its inception was -66.01%, which is greater than EEMA's maximum drawdown of -44.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPP and EEMA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EPPEEMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.01%

-44.18%

-21.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.79%

-14.30%

+5.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.29%

-20.23%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.31%

-40.67%

+14.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.30%

-44.18%

+4.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

-1.17%

-1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.62%

-13.97%

+3.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

3.79%

-1.01%

Volatility

EPP vs. EEMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP) is 4.65%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) has a volatility of 8.53%. This indicates that EPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EPPEEMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

8.53%

-3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.94%

17.40%

-5.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.51%

20.39%

-5.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

20.41%

-3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

20.87%

-1.76%

EPP vs. EEMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPP has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMA's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPP vs. EEMA - Dividend Comparison

EPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than EEMA's 1.16% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMA
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF		1.16%1.48%1.74%2.02%1.78%2.19%1.15%1.86%2.17%1.74%1.74%2.44%
EPP
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF		3.44%3.77%3.81%4.10%4.37%4.58%2.28%3.89%5.00%4.15%3.96%4.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

EPP and EEMA have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMA has higher volatility (8.53%) compared to EPP (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPP dropped -66.01% vs EEMA's -44.18%.

On 10-year performance, EEMA leads with 10.80% vs 7.60% for EPP. On fees, EPP is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, EPP has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EEMA has performed better with a 10.80% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EPP is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EEMA.

EPP has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 1.16% for EEMA.

EPP tracks MSCI Pacific ex-Japan Index, while EEMA tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia Index. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EPP and 0.50% for EEMA.

EEMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPP and EEMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer