PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPOL vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPOL vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPOL achieves a 22.62% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 13.39% return. Over the past 10 years, EPOL has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 11.96%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.44% annualized return.


EPOL

1D
0.16%
1M
8.60%
6M
14.79%
YTD
22.62%
1Y
40.70%
3Y*
33.53%
5Y*
18.62%
10Y*
11.96%
ALL TIME*
6.44%

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.97%
6M
9.59%
YTD
13.39%
1Y
24.21%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
13.44%
ALL TIME*
12.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$103.52M$104.25M$110.17M
$18.30M$16.66M$16.43M

EPOL vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
22.62%77.34%-2.61%50.70%-24.62%12.21%-8.38%-6.13%-13.76%52.43%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
13.39%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between EPOL and DGRO is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.50

The correlation between EPOL and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPOL vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPOL
DGRO

Financial Services

45.7%
20.4%

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
6.5%

Energy

13.2%
4.8%

Basic Materials

7.1%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
11.9%

Communication Services

5.4%
0.1%

Utilities

4.5%
7.3%

Industrials

1.8%
11.3%

Technology

1.7%
17.3%

Healthcare

0.7%
17.9%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

EPOL
45.7%
DGRO
20.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EPOL
14.0%
DGRO
6.5%

Energy

EPOL
13.2%
DGRO
4.8%

Basic Materials

EPOL
7.1%
DGRO
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

EPOL
6.0%
DGRO
11.9%

Communication Services

EPOL
5.4%
DGRO
0.1%

Utilities

EPOL
4.5%
DGRO
7.3%

Industrials

EPOL
1.8%
DGRO
11.3%

Technology

EPOL
1.7%
DGRO
17.3%

Healthcare

EPOL
0.7%
DGRO
17.9%

Real Estate

EPOL

-

DGRO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPOL vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EPOL
EPOL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EPOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPOL Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
EPOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPOL Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EPOL vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EPOLDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.45

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

3.61

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.96

14.07

-4.11

EPOL vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPOL Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPOL and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EPOL vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPOL drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPOL and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPOLDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.72%

-35.10%

-28.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-6.47%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.56%

-14.03%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.21%

-19.31%

-34.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.41%

-35.10%

-26.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.35%

+1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.64%

-3.41%

-23.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

1.66%

+2.41%

Volatility

EPOL vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 3.21%. This indicates that EPOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPOLDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

3.21%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.34%

7.12%

+11.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.12%

9.61%

+13.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.12%

13.79%

+15.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.42%

16.58%

+10.84%

EPOL vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPOL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPOL vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

EPOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than DGRO's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.89%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
3.44%4.78%6.04%2.87%2.65%1.33%1.44%2.51%1.44%1.88%2.14%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPOL and DGRO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPOL has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to DGRO (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPOL dropped -63.72% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.44% vs 11.96% for EPOL. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.44% return vs 11.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EPOL.

EPOL has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 1.89% for DGRO.

EPOL is categorized as Europe Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. EPOL tracks MSCI Poland Investable Market Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EPOL and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPOL and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer