EPMB vs. GRNJ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EPMB (Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF) and GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPMB charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRNJ.

Performance

EPMB vs. GRNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF (EPMB) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPMB achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly lower than GRNJ's 22.19% return.

EPMB

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: 2.30%
• YTD: 14.90%
• 6M: 13.66%
• 1Y: 27.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRNJ

• 1D: -2.56%
• 1M: 1.56%
• YTD: 22.19%
• 6M: 17.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPMB vs. GRNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EPMB Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF	14.90%	6.36%
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF	22.19%	6.02%

Correlation

The correlation between EPMB and GRNJ is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.75

Return for Risk

EPMB vs. GRNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPMB

EPMB Risk / Return Rank: 65
EPMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
EPMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
EPMB Omega Ratio Rank: 59
EPMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
EPMB Martin Ratio Rank: 69

GRNJ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPMB vs. GRNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF (EPMB) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPMB	GRNJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.56	—	—

Drawdowns

EPMB vs. GRNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPMB drawdown since its inception was -8.95%, smaller than the maximum GRNJ drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPMB and GRNJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPMB	GRNJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.95%	-17.32%	+8.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.26%	-4.23%	+2.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.46%	-4.09%	+2.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EPMB	GRNJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.44%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.96%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.60%	30.86%	-16.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.81%	30.86%	-16.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.81%	30.86%	-16.05%

EPMB vs. GRNJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPMB has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than GRNJ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPMB vs. GRNJ - Dividend Comparison

EPMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, while GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
EPMB Harbor Mid Cap Core ETF	1.56%	1.79%
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPMB and GRNJ in my portfolio?

EPMB and GRNJ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EPMB or GRNJ?

On fees, GRNJ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPMB or GRNJ?

GRNJ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPMB or GRNJ?

EPMB has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.

What is the main difference between EPMB and GRNJ?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Fundstrat. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPMB and 0.75% for GRNJ.