EPIBX vs. EPGFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EPIBX (EuroPac International Bond Fund) and EPGFX (EuroPac Gold Fund) are both mutual funds - EPIBX is a Global Bonds fund managed by Euro Pacific Asset Management, while EPGFX is a Gold fund managed by Euro Pacific Asset Management. Over the past 10 years, EPIBX returned 1.90%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for EPGFX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPIBX charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.40%/yr for EPGFX.

Performance

EPIBX vs. EPGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EuroPac International Bond Fund (EPIBX) and EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPIBX achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly lower than EPGFX's -0.25% return. Over the past 10 years, EPIBX has underperformed EPGFX with an annualized return of 1.90%, while EPGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.24% annualized return.

EPIBX

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: -0.34%
• 6M: 0.22%
• 1Y: 3.87%
• 3Y*: 4.13%
• 5Y*: 1.69%
• 10Y*: 1.90%

EPGFX

• 1D: -2.43%
• 1M: -2.43%
• YTD: -0.25%
• 6M: -3.71%
• 1Y: 56.98%
• 3Y*: 33.59%
• 5Y*: 14.32%
• 10Y*: 11.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPIBX vs. EPGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EPIBX EuroPac International Bond Fund	-0.34%	12.90%	-3.30%	9.94%	-7.34%	-4.60%	7.45%	5.13%	-3.63%	9.96%
EPGFX EuroPac Gold Fund	-0.25%	129.06%	8.51%	2.31%	-14.00%	-18.06%	36.99%	37.25%	-13.85%	12.73%

Correlation

The correlation between EPIBX and EPGFX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.46

The correlation between EPIBX and EPGFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EPIBX vs. EPGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPIBX

EPIBX Risk / Return Rank: 8
EPIBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
EPIBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
EPIBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
EPIBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
EPIBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

EPGFX

EPGFX Risk / Return Rank: 23
EPGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
EPGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
EPGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
EPGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
EPGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPIBX vs. EPGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EuroPac International Bond Fund (EPIBX) and EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPIBX	EPGFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	1.36	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.03	1.74	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.25	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.71	1.77	-1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.96	4.73	-2.77

EPIBX vs. EPGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPIBX Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the EPGFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPIBX and EPGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPIBX vs. EPGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPIBX drawdown since its inception was -24.65%, smaller than the maximum EPGFX drawdown of -56.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPIBX and EPGFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPIBX	EPGFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.65%	-56.70%	+32.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.01%	-30.77%	+25.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.17%	-30.77%	+24.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.38%	-44.99%	+29.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.41%	-51.03%	+33.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.16%	-23.94%	+20.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.19%	-22.03%	+11.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	11.53%	-9.73%

Volatility

EPIBX vs. EPGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EuroPac International Bond Fund (EPIBX) is 1.76%, while EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that EPIBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPIBX	EPGFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.76%	14.28%	-12.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.13%	33.79%	-29.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.88%	40.25%	-35.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.68%	32.82%	-27.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.64%	32.58%	-26.94%

EPIBX vs. EPGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPIBX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EPGFX's 1.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPIBX vs. EPGFX - Dividend Comparison

EPIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, less than EPGFX's 6.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EPGFX EuroPac Gold Fund	6.88%	6.86%	10.36%	0.00%	0.00%	2.49%	8.67%	0.00%	0.00%	2.56%	19.31%	0.00%
EPIBX EuroPac International Bond Fund	4.08%	3.25%	2.92%	2.16%	0.00%	0.00%	1.09%	0.00%	1.43%	0.00%	0.00%	1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPIBX and EPGFX in my portfolio?

EPIBX and EPGFX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPIBX or EPGFX?

EPGFX has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to EPIBX (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPIBX dropped -24.65% vs EPGFX's -56.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.