EPI vs. GDMN

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

EPI (WisdomTree India Earnings Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EPI is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree India Earnings Index, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. EPI is passively managed, while GDMN is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EPI returned 8.38%/yr vs 52.54%/yr for GDMN. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPI charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.

Performance

EPI vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPI achieves a -6.85% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -23.40% return.

EPI

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 1.77%
• YTD: -6.85%
• 6M: -6.18%
• 1Y: -7.47%
• 3Y*: 8.38%
• 5Y*: 6.51%
• 10Y*: 9.80%

GDMN

• 1D: -6.72%
• 1M: -21.34%
• YTD: -23.40%
• 6M: -29.26%
• 1Y: 46.18%
• 3Y*: 52.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPI vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EPI WisdomTree India Earnings Fund	-6.85%	2.25%	10.70%	26.03%	-4.74%	1.56%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	-23.40%	237.09%	28.23%	12.97%	-14.62%	6.93%

Correlation

The correlation between EPI and GDMN is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021	0.27

EPI vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EPI	GDMN
Financial Services	23.2%	-
Energy	16.4%	-
Basic Materials	14.2%	100.0%
Industrials	9.9%	-
Technology	8.3%	-
Utilities	8.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.6%	-
Healthcare	5.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	-
Communication Services	2.0%	-
Real Estate	0.9%	-

Return for Risk

EPI vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPI

EPI Risk / Return Rank: 5
EPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
EPI Omega Ratio Rank: 5
EPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
EPI Martin Ratio Rank: 4

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 23
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 27
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPI vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPI	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.49	0.72	-1.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.61	1.23	-1.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.17	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.44	0.93	-1.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.02	2.41	-3.42

EPI vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPI Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPI and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPI vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPI drawdown since its inception was -66.21%, which is greater than GDMN's maximum drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPI and GDMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPI	GDMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.21%	-52.82%	-13.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.88%	-49.72%	+32.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.89%	-49.72%	+27.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.93%	-49.72%	+34.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.64%	-19.16%	+0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.35%	19.24%	-11.89%

Volatility

EPI vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI) is 4.57%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 23.02%. This indicates that EPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPI	GDMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.57%	23.02%	-18.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.09%	55.58%	-42.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.24%	64.46%	-49.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.26%	48.31%	-32.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.30%	48.31%	-28.01%

EPI vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPI has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPI vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

EPI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EPI WisdomTree India Earnings Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.27%	0.15%	6.01%	1.18%	0.78%	1.17%	1.18%	0.85%	1.05%	1.20%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	3.53%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPI and GDMN in my portfolio?

EPI and GDMN have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPI or GDMN?

GDMN has higher volatility (23.02%) compared to EPI (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPI dropped -66.21% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

Which ETF is better, EPI or GDMN?

On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 52.54% vs 8.38% for EPI. On fees, GDMN is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, EPI has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPI or GDMN?

Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 52.54% return vs 8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPI or GDMN?

GDMN is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for EPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPI or GDMN?

GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 0.00% for EPI.

What is the main difference between EPI and GDMN?

EPI is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for EPI and 0.45% for GDMN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.